From: Jimbo on 8 Dec 2009 10:30 On Nov 14, 7:57 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 14, 7:35 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:00:53 -0500, Doctroid > > > <doctr...(a)mailinator.com> wrote: > > >In article <q4ptf55971pdfhs7sqt7d9s06ri5hbg...(a)4ax.com>, > > > George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > > > >> [Hammond] > > >> Yeah Heller was there..... they used to call him the "red > > >> vector". > > > >That was him. I can vouch for you, George. Folks, the stuff about > > >studying physics at WPI? True. > > > >Doctroid > > > [Hammond] > > What was yor major at WPI? Don't tell me you actually took > > a degree in Physics? > > ======================================== > > GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > > Primary sitehttp://webspace..webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > > Mirror site > > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 > > ======================================= > > God doesn't need to prove He exists. > Why should man? > If God's glassy eyed sycophants weren't out trying to get all others to believe, then there would be no need for proof. However, there are, and their is. |