GOD, RELATIVITY & THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
in [Relativity]
|
From: John Stafford on 14 Nov 2009 09:12 In article <ahnrf5l1qo9ckid05efsfk82c4aoh25ce0(a)4ax.com>, George Hammond <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:04:45 -0600, John Stafford > <nhoj(a)droffats.ten> wrote: > > >In article <ullpf5lkdd2odj3s1dvp4b6p2mg69rnmmv(a)4ax.com>, > > George Hammond <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote: > >> > > >> [Hammond] > >> Tell us something we don't already know. The research > >> was sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Mental > >> health which is why their addresses is on it, and GEORGE > >> HAMMOND is listed as the author. > > > >Mind if I find PROOF of that sponsorship? > > > > > [Hammond] > Get outta here stalker. Wanna talk to the FBI and Homeland > Security? Now George, you have tried similar threats in the past and they did not go well for you; besides, I am not really interested in the issue.
From: Wally on 14 Nov 2009 17:16 On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:44:22 -0800, George Hammond <Nowhere1(a)notspam.net> wrote: >On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:29:44 -0800 (PST), Jimbo ><ckdbigtoe(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Nov 11, 2:43�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:00:27 -0800 (PST), Jimbo >>> >>> <ckdbig...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >> > �It's a common fallacy to >>> >> >assume your conclusion, then try to prop it up. >>> >>> >> [Hammond] >>> >> Never did that. �I derived a proven result. >>> >>> >Yes, you most certainly did. >>> >>> [Hammond] >>> Your apology is magnanimously accepted. >>> >> >> >>Your idiocy is duly noted. >> >> >[Hammond] >Yours is ignored. what a joke
From: Jimbo on 14 Nov 2009 17:04 On Nov 12, 12:44 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:29:44 -0800 (PST), Jimbo > > > > > > <ckdbig...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 11, 2:43 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:00:27 -0800 (PST), Jimbo > > >> <ckdbig...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > It's a common fallacy to > >> >> >assume your conclusion, then try to prop it up. > > >> >> [Hammond] > >> >> Never did that. I derived a proven result. > > >> >Yes, you most certainly did. > > >> [Hammond] > >> Your apology is magnanimously accepted. > > >Your idiocy is duly noted. > > [Hammond] > Yours is ignored. Since I have no idiocy, I will assume you are a liar as well as an idiot.
From: George Hammond on 14 Nov 2009 22:35 On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:00:53 -0500, Doctroid <doctroid(a)mailinator.com> wrote: >In article <q4ptf55971pdfhs7sqt7d9s06ri5hbg8j5(a)4ax.com>, > George Hammond <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote: > >> [Hammond] >> Yeah Heller was there..... they used to call him the "red >> vector". > >That was him. I can vouch for you, George. Folks, the stuff about >studying physics at WPI? True. > >Doctroid > > [Hammond] What was yor major at WPI? Don't tell me you actually took a degree in Physics? ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: BURT on 14 Nov 2009 19:57
On Nov 14, 7:35 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.net> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:00:53 -0500, Doctroid > > <doctr...(a)mailinator.com> wrote: > >In article <q4ptf55971pdfhs7sqt7d9s06ri5hbg...(a)4ax.com>, > > George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > > >> [Hammond] > >> Yeah Heller was there..... they used to call him the "red > >> vector". > > >That was him. I can vouch for you, George. Folks, the stuff about > >studying physics at WPI? True. > > >Doctroid > > [Hammond] > What was yor major at WPI? Don't tell me you actually took > a degree in Physics? > ======================================== > GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > Primary sitehttp://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > Mirror site > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 > ======================================= God doesn't need to prove He exists. Why should man? Mitch Raemsch |