From: H.S. on 13 Jun 2010 12:20 On 13/06/10 02:24 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered: >> replying! If you wanted to reply to the OP, you should have done that ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> instead of replying to me. I am not sure which email client you are > > Yes you jumped in like an AOLer with your "Me To" comment, adding I don't think you really understood what I meant by explaining how it is impossible for *me* to jump in *your* reply and change its recipient or references, unless you are were explicit replying to me (I can rephrase it further if you still don't get it). Point being, you stated that you were conversing with the OP and that I jumped in the middle, which is impossible, but I just followed the thread accordingly. > nothing of significant value to this thread. .... why in the world did you reply to me instead of carrying on the conversation with the OP? Can you show me where you actually responded to the OP?* (not really sure what an AOLer is, and quite sure it is not relevant for me to look it up anyway). > > Oh and since it seems it's too difficult for you to determine my > user-agent header, I'm using mutt. * That is a sane mail reader, wonder if you are using thread view in it. My suspicion is, not. -- Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without ever having been read. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hv308g$ong$1(a)dough.gmane.org
From: Steve Fishpaste on 13 Jun 2010 23:00 On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:16:16PM -0400, H.S. uttered: > On 13/06/10 02:24 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered: > >> replying! If you wanted to reply to the OP, you should have done that > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> instead of replying to me. I am not sure which email client you are > > > > Yes you jumped in like an AOLer with your "Me To" comment, adding > > I don't think you really understood what I meant by explaining how it is > impossible for *me* to jump in *your* reply and change its recipient or > references, unless you are were explicit replying to me (I can rephrase > it further if you still don't get it). Point being, you stated that you > were conversing with the OP and that I jumped in the middle, which is > impossible, but I just followed the thread accordingly. > > > > nothing of significant value to this thread. > > ... why in the world did you reply to me instead of carrying on the > conversation with the OP? Can you show me where you actually responded > to the OP?* (not really sure what an AOLer is, and quite sure it is not > relevant for me to look it up anyway). <shaking head> Never mind; It's over your head. > > > > Oh and since it seems it's too difficult for you to determine my > > user-agent header, I'm using mutt. > > * That is a sane mail reader, wonder if you are using thread view in it. > My suspicion is, not. Geezus you really have no clue! LOL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100614024948.GA30244(a)google.com
From: H.S. on 13 Jun 2010 23:30
On 13/06/10 10:49 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:16:16PM -0400, H.S. uttered: >> On 13/06/10 02:24 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered: >>>> replying! If you wanted to reply to the OP, you should have done that >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>> instead of replying to me. I am not sure which email client you are >>> >>> Yes you jumped in like an AOLer with your "Me To" comment, adding >> >> I don't think you really understood what I meant by explaining how it is >> impossible for *me* to jump in *your* reply and change its recipient or >> references, unless you are were explicit replying to me (I can rephrase >> it further if you still don't get it). Point being, you stated that you >> were conversing with the OP and that I jumped in the middle, which is >> impossible, but I just followed the thread accordingly. >> >> >>> nothing of significant value to this thread. >> >> ... why in the world did you reply to me instead of carrying on the >> conversation with the OP? Can you show me where you actually responded >> to the OP?* (not really sure what an AOLer is, and quite sure it is not >> relevant for me to look it up anyway). > > <shaking head> Never mind; It's over your head. > >>> >>> Oh and since it seems it's too difficult for you to determine my >>> user-agent header, I'm using mutt. >> >> * That is a sane mail reader, wonder if you are using thread view in it. >> My suspicion is, not. > > Geezus you really have no clue! LOL > > The progression of this sub-thread is quite detrimental to the quality of this list. So, let me apologize for any misunderstanding or mistakes on my part. Cheers. -- Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without ever having been read. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hv475j$1nj$1(a)dough.gmane.org |