Gamma-ray burst could kill off ocean life
in [Physics]
|
From: Sam Wormley on 27 Jul 2010 01:48 On 7/27/10 12:22 AM, Brad Guth wrote: > On Jul 26, 7:39 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/26/10 9:15 PM, Brad Guth wrote: >> >>> On Jul 26, 5:59 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 7/26/10 7:22 PM, Brad Guth wrote: >> >>>>> Astrophysics in currently in the toilet. Far to much doesn't adds up >>>>> and new stuff keeps getting more weird with nearly every discovery. >> >>>> Translation: Brad doesn't understand a bit of astrophysics, as is >>>> documented in his posting record. >> >>> And your infomercial parroting means what exactly? >> >>> Are you suggesting that a trained monkey couldn't do as well as >>> yourself? >> >>> ~ BG >> >> Brad, What evidence do you have to support any claim of yours >> about Sirius B? > > The same evidence that you use to claim there's nothing associating > our solar system with Sirius B, any other Sirius star or that of the > original molecular cloud that seems to have vanished. > > A proper computer simulation could demonstrate each of our > interpretations, but then you have no idea as to where our solar > system was as of 260 million some odd years ago, and you sure as hell > can't tell us a damn original thing about Sirius. > > ~ BG Brad do you have any evidence? Any evidence to support any claim of yours about Sirius B?
From: Brad Guth on 27 Jul 2010 09:31 On Jul 26, 10:48 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/27/10 12:22 AM,BradGuthwrote: > > > > > On Jul 26, 7:39 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/26/10 9:15 PM,BradGuthwrote: > > >>> On Jul 26, 5:59 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On 7/26/10 7:22 PM,BradGuthwrote: > > >>>>> Astrophysics in currently in the toilet. Far to much doesn't adds up > >>>>> and new stuff keeps getting more weird with nearly every discovery. > > >>>> Translation:Braddoesn't understand a bit of astrophysics, as is > >>>> documented in his posting record. > > >>> And your infomercial parroting means what exactly? > > >>> Are you suggesting that a trained monkey couldn't do as well as > >>> yourself? > > >>> ~ BG > > >> Brad, What evidence do you have to support any claim of yours > >> about Sirius B? > > > The same evidence that you use to claim there's nothing associating > > our solar system with Sirius B, any other Sirius star or that of the > > original molecular cloud that seems to have vanished. > > > A proper computer simulation could demonstrate each of our > > interpretations, but then you have no idea as to where our solar > > system was as of 260 million some odd years ago, and you sure as hell > > can't tell us a damn original thing about Sirius. > > > ~ BG > > Braddo you have any evidence? Any evidence to support any claim of > yours about Sirius B? Yes, I believe I do. Just like your evidence, whereas mine too is still subjective and can be interpreted to suit. Can you tell us where those Sirius(B) planets went? Can you tell us how far away the Sirius(B) Oort cloud is? ~ BG
From: Brad Guth on 27 Jul 2010 09:40 On Jul 26, 8:57 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/26/10 10:47 PM,BradGuthwrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 7:37 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/26/10 9:12 PM,BradGuthwrote: > > >>> Astrophysics is changing the rules as we type. Each time something > >>> unusual or weird gets detected, the astrophysics wizards go into > >>> damage-control mode, of obfuscating and/or making up excuses for > >>> whatever covers the most butts. > > >> I asked a simple and fair question,Brad: What evidence do you > >> have to support any claim of yours about Sirius B? > > > As much deductive evidence as anyone else has pertaining to the 65 > > million year event that terminated most life on Earth. > > > That little impact that most of you want to believe was it, wasn't > > nearly large enough. Creating the Arctic ocean basin, now that would > > have been large enough. > > Show us you calculation that it "wasn't big enough". How do you > calculate what is big enough? What is the killing mechanism? > > > > > On the other hand, you seem to think all local stars are passive and > > planet friendly. > > > ~ BG As far as via impacts go: http://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEffects/ Have fun, although much better and sophisticated simulators have to exist, as well as those having been public funded, so that we should have access to using them. As to being zapped by a serious star or whatever item(s), I agree that a "Gamma-ray burst could kill off ocean life". Are you suggesting that Earth never got zapped, and much less by anything nearby? ~ BG
From: Chris.B on 28 Jul 2010 03:16 On Jul 27, 3:40 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Have fun, although much better and sophisticated simulators have to > exist, as well as those having been public funded, so that we should > have access to using them. > > As to being zapped by a serious star or whatever item(s), I agree that > a "Gamma-ray burst could kill off ocean life". Are you suggesting > that Earth never got zapped, and much less by anything nearby? > > ~ BG Your recent posting style suggests that you have been pawned off with fake medication without any active ingredients. Go back to the pharmacist and demand your original medication as per your psychiatrist's standing prescription. Accept no substitutes!
From: Brad Guth on 29 Jul 2010 07:40
On Jul 28, 12:16 am, "Chris.B" <chri...(a)nypost.dk> wrote: > On Jul 27, 3:40 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Have fun, although much better and sophisticated simulators have to > > exist, as well as those having been public funded, so that we should > > have access to using them. > > > As to being zapped by a serious star or whatever item(s), I agree that > > a "Gamma-ray burst could kill off ocean life". Are you suggesting > > that Earth never got zapped, and much less by anything nearby? > > > ~ BG > > Your recent posting style suggests that you have been pawned off with > fake medication without any active ingredients. > > Go back to the pharmacist and demand your original medication as per > your psychiatrist's standing prescription. > > Accept no substitutes! In other words, you are just as bogus as most others, and have no actual ideas other than whatever a faith-based Semite parrot has to say. Oops! do you have an actual computer simulation that isn't just animation eyecandy? ~ BG |