Prev: Suppose P is a Pisa Fish and NP is a fish by any other name.
Next: The P=NP problem solved!
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 23 May 2010 22:28
stevendaryl3016(a)yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) writes:

> In article <87vdaguelp.fsf(a)phiwumbda.org>, Jesse F. Hughes says...
>>
>>stevendaryl3016(a)yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) writes:
>>
>>> byron says...
>>>>
>>>>the australian philosopher colin leslie dean argues that Genetics cant
>>>>account for generation/origin of new species
>>>
>>> But what you don't seem to realize is that australian philosopher
>>> colin leslie dean is a complete idiot.
>>
>>I guess he lost his promotion. He was an australian scientist not so
>>long ago.
>
> What I'm wondering is how "byron" became such a devoted follower.

Elsimelsi (sp?) showed byron just how monstrously clever colin leslie
dean is, I reckon.

And the two of them decided to spend their lives convincing others
that Dean is right and everything is meaningless. Because, well, why
not?

(The bad "erotic" poetry is just the icing on the cake, I guess.)

--
Jesse F. Hughes
"Now 'pure math' makes sense as well as clearly it's a peacock game,
where some of you see it as a way to show you as being highly
intelligent and thus more desirable to women." -- James S. Harris
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Suppose P is a Pisa Fish and NP is a fish by any other name.
Next: The P=NP problem solved!