From: byron on 22 May 2010 00:55 the australian philosopher colin leslie dean argues that Genetics cant account for generation/origin of new species http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/Natural_selection.pdf THE REFUTATION. EVOLUTIONARY THEORY: NATURAL SELECTION SHOWN TO BE WRONG put simply it is argued that the generation of new species is due to random changes in genes if the process is random then genetics cannot account for why a species appears for being random there can be no deterministic reason why it happens in a particular why- once the generation process has started genetics can account for how it unfolds-but genetics cannot account for its random starting point -as this is just by chance- chaos theory might but genetics cant what may cause a gene to alter randomly could be radiation chemicals virus etc but this all happens by chance Being by chance genetics thus cannot account for the generation of new species
From: Daryl McCullough on 22 May 2010 10:23 byron says... > >the australian philosopher colin leslie dean argues that Genetics cant >account for generation/origin of new species But what you don't seem to realize is that australian philosopher colin leslie dean is a complete idiot. -- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 22 May 2010 11:43 stevendaryl3016(a)yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) writes: > byron says... >> >>the australian philosopher colin leslie dean argues that Genetics cant >>account for generation/origin of new species > > But what you don't seem to realize is that australian philosopher > colin leslie dean is a complete idiot. I guess he lost his promotion. He was an australian scientist not so long ago. -- Jesse F. Hughes "Like the ski resort full of girls hunting for husbands and husbands hunting for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem." -- Alan MacKay
From: Daryl McCullough on 22 May 2010 12:14 In article <87vdaguelp.fsf(a)phiwumbda.org>, Jesse F. Hughes says... > >stevendaryl3016(a)yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) writes: > >> byron says... >>> >>>the australian philosopher colin leslie dean argues that Genetics cant >>>account for generation/origin of new species >> >> But what you don't seem to realize is that australian philosopher >> colin leslie dean is a complete idiot. > >I guess he lost his promotion. He was an australian scientist not so >long ago. What I'm wondering is how "byron" became such a devoted follower. -- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
From: Peter Webb on 23 May 2010 00:34 <SNIP> > this all happens by chance Being by chance genetics thus > cannot account for the generation of new species What happens when you spin a roulette wheel all happens entirely by chance. Being by chance, this cannot account for why running a casino can be such a profitable activity.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Suppose P is a Pisa Fish and NP is a fish by any other name. Next: The P=NP problem solved! |