Getting to beta1
in [PgSql]
|
From: Robert Haas on 15 Mar 2010 20:40 On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > We can easily create another alpha by April 3. I think the big question > is whether we can put out beta1 while we still have open HS/SR issues. > My guess is no. My other guess is that we will still have open HS/SR > issues on April 3. So, putting those two guesses together, we will > create a new alpha by April 3 for you. :-| I think we need to do a better job defining exactly what we think the "must fix" HS/SR issues are. Otherwise I can see this process of trying to get to beta dragging out almost indefinitely. ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Dimitri Fontaine on 16 Mar 2010 05:02 Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> writes: > Yes, and on pgsql-docs rather than on this mailing list. > > Or ... J.F.D.I (Just F---- Do It). That is, if someone contributed a > whole buncha new text to the tutorial on pgsql-docs, I can't imagine it > being rejected out of hand. That was the bulk of the question, thanks for such a clear answer. I'll see about giving some time to that, out of the critical path to beta. > For my part, I plan to just write the tutorial in whatever tool makes it > easiest to write (likely Lyx, but maybe OOo). Then people can discuss > what portions belong in the docs, or not. Should I follow you on that choice or just send a doc patch with poor SGML markup? -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Josh Berkus on 17 Mar 2010 12:54 All, A user at SFPUG last night pointed out why we should release a beta, rather than an alpha, sooner rather than later: because there are no Windows packages for Alphas. Currently, our Windows users are *not* testing 9.0. Which means we're just putting off the day when we hear about Windows-specific bugs. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Dave Page on 17 Mar 2010 12:57 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> wrote: > All, > > > A user at SFPUG last night pointed out why we should release a beta, > rather than an alpha, sooner rather than later: because there are no > Windows packages for Alphas. Yes there: http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pgdevdownload.do We've produced them since Alpha 2 iirc. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Josh Berkus on 17 Mar 2010 13:02
> Yes there: http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pgdevdownload.do > > We've produced them since Alpha 2 iirc. Oh! Most people don't know about these ... I need to advertise them! BTW, at SFPUG there were reports of some kind of issue with the One-Click installer for 8.4.3. Is that resolved, or is this the first time you've heard about it? -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |