Getting to beta1
in [PgSql]
|
From: Simon Riggs on 13 Mar 2010 11:58 On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 22:28 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Where are we in getting to beta1? I know people are looking to me for > 9.0 release notes and I will have them done in about a week, but what > about open issues? I don't see many on the main 9.0 open items page: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items#Bugs > > The list has been reduced greatly in the past week. What about HS/SR > open items? I have these things on my list * Minor page xid bug fix * btree delete standby-side derivation of xid * review of StartupXLog issue, on open items list, has an effect on HS I expect to be finished with those by Wed, perhaps Thurs. Some additional open items on SR * trigger_file no longer supports "fast" mode. There is no way to startup server quickly if it has fallen behind, as is currently possible with 8.4 * There should be a default for "trigger_file" so that you can failover a server even if this has not been specified. To me the open items look like at least 2 weeks work on SR, given some of them will likely need discussion rather than just action. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Josh Berkus on 13 Mar 2010 14:26 > The list has been reduced greatly in the past week. What about HS/SR > open items? I'd like to see vacuum_defer_cleanup_age added to the "Archive" section of postgresql.conf, and add it to the docs (I'll write something this week). I'd like to get rid of the associated hint-bits bogus error messsage. --Josh Berkus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Heikki Linnakangas on 14 Mar 2010 10:53 Simon Riggs wrote: > I have these things on my list > > * Minor page xid bug fix > * btree delete standby-side derivation of xid > * review of StartupXLog issue, on open items list, has an effect on HS > > I expect to be finished with those by Wed, perhaps Thurs. Don't forget the "start from shutdown checkpoint" issue. > * There should be a default for "trigger_file" so that you can failover > a server even if this has not been specified. I disagree. In many cases, you never want to failover the standby, and having a default would just get in your way. > To me the open items look like at least 2 weeks work on SR, given some > of them will likely need discussion rather than just action. Yeah, I've unfortunately had very little to no time at all on SR recently. I must reserve some full days for that again... -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Simon Riggs on 14 Mar 2010 12:02 On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 16:53 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > I have these things on my list > > > > * Minor page xid bug fix > > * btree delete standby-side derivation of xid > > * review of StartupXLog issue, on open items list, has an effect on HS > > > > I expect to be finished with those by Wed, perhaps Thurs. > > Don't forget the "start from shutdown checkpoint" issue. How could I? :-) > > * There should be a default for "trigger_file" so that you can failover > > a server even if this has not been specified. > > I disagree. In many cases, you never want to failover the standby, and > having a default would just get in your way. An explanation in the docs would be good. And also a hint of how to failover if you decide in an emergency that the absence was a mistake, in retrospect. > > To me the open items look like at least 2 weeks work on SR, given some > > of them will likely need discussion rather than just action. > > Yeah, I've unfortunately had very little to no time at all on SR > recently. I must reserve some full days for that again... 12 open items says "yes please" to that. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Josh Berkus on 14 Mar 2010 18:38 On 3/14/10 9:02 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > An explanation in the docs would be good. And also a hint of how to > failover if you decide in an emergency that the absence was a mistake, > in retrospect. I'm planning on writing a "Guide to HS & SR" for the beta. Originally I planned to put this in the main docs, but I couldn't figure out how to fit it in there structurally. Plus, it needs more examples, output samples, and a tutorial feel. --Josh Berkus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: [HACKERS] Getting to beta1 Next: [HACKERS] how to use advanced gist options |