From: Andy Burns on 20 Feb 2010 05:23 andy wrote: > some posts have this heading in them: > "Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. > This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (27 Feb, 08:32). " That's Google's way of dealing with the x-no-archive request on a message. > not many are thus described Personal preference, some people don't like any of their messages archived, some don't want messages to certain groups, or relating to certain subjects archived, others like all their messages archived. But the whole concept of controlling who archives what came very late to the game, basically when the web met usenet, some archives don't obey requests not to archive. > perhaps someone with more time will bother to explain news clients to > me: does it involve downloading tons of messages to your PC You can have online or offline software on your PC, depending how you set them up you can retrieve combinations of headers and body text, automatically, and any others either on demand or next time they go online. I use Thunderbird, though it's far from the best usenet client, I prefer to keep mail and news together, others prefer the opposite, I used to use Agent (I gather the free version is discontinued), there's lots of choice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Usenet_newsreaders You'll also need an account on a news server, your ISP may provide one, but they're more likely to have closed it down or outsourced it nowadays, there are paid 3rd party or free ones available. if you want a starting point for a decent server (where payment is optional) look at eternal-september.org Apologies if I came across as sniffy, you seemed like you were criticising {welcome} for doing nothing out of the ordinary.
From: Steve Terry on 20 Feb 2010 23:11 "Jim" <madonspam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4b7fa66d$0$2103$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > Steve Terry wrote: >> "Jim" <madonspam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:4b7cfdf1$0$2635$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... >>> Steve Terry wrote: >>>> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx_spam(a)trapped__hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>>> news:hi2pn519usrf4om7427nn7m27e15rvgf06(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:34:24 -0000, "Stephen Hammond" >>>>> <Stephen.yourclothesHammond(a)gmail.com> wrote: <snip> >>> >> If long contracts are out, there are lots of one month sim only contracts >> >> Three dabbled with short 6 month M&M contracts, shame they gave up on >> them. >> >> Contract is the grown up way to go, you get proper itemised billing, >> full diverts, full roaming, etc. >> Steve Terry >> > Lots of us don't agree but perhaps we're not grown up yet? > > No need to question it, that's obvious or you would have at least have learned how to trim out my sig from your reply Steve Terry -- Get a free Three 3pay Sim with �2 bonus after �10 top up http://freeagent.three.co.uk/stand/view/id/5276
From: Jim on 21 Feb 2010 03:01
Steve Terry wrote: > "Jim" <madonspam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:4b7fa66d$0$2103$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... >> Steve Terry wrote: >>> "Jim" <madonspam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:4b7cfdf1$0$2635$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... >>>> Steve Terry wrote: >>>>> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx_spam(a)trapped__hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>>>> news:hi2pn519usrf4om7427nn7m27e15rvgf06(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:34:24 -0000, "Stephen Hammond" >>>>>> <Stephen.yourclothesHammond(a)gmail.com> wrote: > <snip> >>> If long contracts are out, there are lots of one month sim only contracts >>> >>> Three dabbled with short 6 month M&M contracts, shame they gave up on >>> them. >>> >>> Contract is the grown up way to go, you get proper itemised billing, >>> full diverts, full roaming, etc. >>> Steve Terry >>> >> Lots of us don't agree but perhaps we're not grown up yet? >> >> > No need to question it, that's obvious or you would have at least > have learned how to trim out my sig from your reply > > Steve Terry > -- > Get a free Three 3pay Sim with �2 bonus after �10 top up > http://freeagent.three.co.uk/stand/view/id/5276 > > Your reasoning is, to say the least, questionable. Your motives for spending so much time talking about TELEPHONES would lead me to think you live a sad and uneventful life. Have fun. |