Prev: begone (was: Re: gone)
Next: Mount hfs+ volume
From: Chick Tower on 24 Feb 2010 22:18 On 2010-02-23, Loki Harfagr <l0k1(a)thedarkdesign.free.fr.INVALID> wrote: > sudo su -c 'umount /dev/shm/FFFFm' Why have you invoked both sudo and "su -c", Loki? Wouldn't sudo alone suffice? -- Chick Tower For e-mail: aols2 DOT sent DOT towerboy AT xoxy DOT net
From: Loki Harfagr on 25 Feb 2010 04:45
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:18:09 +0000, Chick Tower did cat : > On 2010-02-23, Loki Harfagr <l0k1(a)thedarkdesign.free.fr.INVALID> wrote: >> sudo su -c 'umount /dev/shm/FFFFm' > > Why have you invoked both sudo and "su -c", Loki? Wouldn't sudo alone > suffice? That's right in a way :-) It's just an habit from work where we have a lot of box and a lot of different admins and through the sudoers we /try to believe/ that we manage different levels of risk ;-) For a personal desktop or a small set of savvies you can use 'su' as you like. (OT, some cleansing is missing at the end of my previous PoC: rm -rf /dev/shm/FFFF{,m} ) |