From: Chick Tower on
On 2010-02-23, Loki Harfagr <l0k1(a)thedarkdesign.free.fr.INVALID> wrote:
> sudo su -c 'umount /dev/shm/FFFFm'

Why have you invoked both sudo and "su -c", Loki? Wouldn't sudo alone
suffice?
--
Chick Tower

For e-mail: aols2 DOT sent DOT towerboy AT xoxy DOT net
From: Loki Harfagr on
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:18:09 +0000, Chick Tower did cat :

> On 2010-02-23, Loki Harfagr <l0k1(a)thedarkdesign.free.fr.INVALID> wrote:
>> sudo su -c 'umount /dev/shm/FFFFm'
>
> Why have you invoked both sudo and "su -c", Loki? Wouldn't sudo alone
> suffice?

That's right in a way :-) It's just an habit from work where we
have a lot of box and a lot of different admins and through the sudoers
we /try to believe/ that we manage different levels of risk ;-)
For a personal desktop or a small set of savvies you can use 'su' as you like.

(OT, some cleansing is missing at the end of my previous PoC:
rm -rf /dev/shm/FFFF{,m}
)
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: begone (was: Re: gone)
Next: Mount hfs+ volume