From: Geoffrey S. Mendelson on
PeterD wrote:
> The radio/receiver would make no difference at all. But he might try
> the phono input that may be a lower level input.

IMHO a really bad thing to do. At best it will overload the phono input
and produce distorted sound with too little trebble due to RIAA equlaization.

At worst it will burn it out, and then you won't be able to use it or sell
it to someone else. :-(

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel gsm(a)mendelson.com N3OWJ/4X1GM
New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or
understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation.
i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia.
From: Dave Plowman (News) on
In article <3h8e88.987.17.8(a)news.alt.net>,
Meat Plow wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:37:43 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
> <grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net>wrote:

> >I can't find a manual for the STA-19, but the STA-20 manual indicates
> >that the CD/tape input is a high-level input -- as you would expect it
> >to be.
> >
> >The guy is probably an idiot who doesn't understand he needs a cable
> >with RCAs on one end, and an 1/8" stereo jack on the other.
> >

> all inputs except for a phonograph are line level or max 1VPP.

Hope not unless the pot is a discrete one and straight after the input.
You'll get a great deal more than 1v P to P out of many CD players.

--
*If only you'd use your powers for good instead of evil.

Dave Plowman dave(a)davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
From: David Nebenzahl on
On 2/15/2010 3:08 AM Dave Plowman (News) spake thus:

> In article
> <92c38ac3-d03e-4ae2-9f00-776fa1b25e79(a)s33g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
> Cartrivision1 <doidy1(a)juno.com> wrote:
>
>> I sold a Realistic mini receiver to a fellow who wanted to run a CD
>> player through it. I did not ask which brand/model CD player that he
>> has but I told him that the receiver had a 1/8 inch "mini jack" on
>> front labeled "tape", and regular RCA inputs on back for tape and
>> phono. His son has a similar model but his input on front is labeled
>> "CD/Tape". He told me that I mislead him and he cannot use it for
>> CD. I explained to him precisely what I had, including model number
>> (he responded to my ad) so I cannot figure out why he could not use
>> one for running a CD player and not the other?
>
> Is he old? At one time some amps could be connected to the head on a tape
> deck - so that input had high gain and equalization. A bit like a pickup
> input.

Well, yeah, I remember that. Inputs were associated with their
equalization schemes; phono (magnetic) inputs were RIAA, and tape head
inputs were NAB equalized. I remember as a kid fooling around with a
Viking tape deck that lacked any electronics; it was made to be plugged
directly into an amplifier (or preamp).


--
You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.

- a Usenet "apology"
From: William Sommerwerck on
> Well, yeah, I remember that. Inputs were associated with
> their equalization schemes; phono (magnetic) inputs were
> RIAA, and tape head inputs were NAB equalized. I remember
> as a kid fooling around with a Viking tape deck that lacked
> any electronics; it was made to be plugged directly into an
> [integrated] amplifier (or preamp).

I remember that deck -- and I remember Knight electronics that had a
tape-head input. Tape-head inputs were not common.


From: PeterD on
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:07:12 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>>> He said that the output from the CD player was not strong enough
>>> for the tape input... something like the output of a tape player is
>>> 100 times stronger than that of a CD. Or vice-versa. I told him that
>>> there should not be a difference. Oh well.
>
>> Yea, he's plugging into the low impedence headphones jack, as the
>> cheap portable Chinese-made CD player he has doesn't have line out.
>> The radio/receiver would make no difference at all. But he might try
>> the phono input that may be a lower level input.
>
>Hold on a second, here.
>
>Any "Walk-device" headphone jack should be able to put out at least half a
>volt, more than enough to drive just about any amplifier. It merely requires
>turning up the volume. A true line output isn't needed (though it would
>probably provide better sound).

I agree many will do the trick just fine, but I've found more than a
few that just would not. Not sure why, either!

>
>Furthermore, the phono input on this receiver is for magnetic pickups. * The
>output of even a headphone jack will drive it into distortion -- not to
>mention having the signal's bass boosted and treble rolled off.
>
>* The manual says that a turntable with a ceramic pickup should be plugged
>into CD/Tape.
>