Prev: Work at Home- Earn $4,000 Weekly With Email Reading Jobs
Next: 1/4 inch socket with isolated switch/es
From: PeterD on 15 Feb 2010 14:37
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:09:04 +0000 (UTC), "Geoffrey S. Mendelson"
<gsm(a)cable.mendelson.com> wrote:

>PeterD wrote:
>> The radio/receiver would make no difference at all. But he might try
>> the phono input that may be a lower level input.
>
>IMHO a really bad thing to do. At best it will overload the phono input
>and produce distorted sound with too little trebble due to RIAA equlaization.
>
>At worst it will burn it out, and then you won't be able to use it or sell
>it to someone else. :-(
>
>Geoff.

I don't think he'd damage it, most of these are well protected.
Agreed, the sound may not be optimal <g> but then again, maybe the guy
will like the way it sounds?
From: David Nebenzahl on 15 Feb 2010 14:44
On 2/15/2010 11:27 AM William Sommerwerck spake thus:

>> Well, yeah, I remember that. Inputs were associated with
>> their equalization schemes; phono (magnetic) inputs were
>> RIAA, and tape head inputs were NAB equalized. I remember
>> as a kid fooling around with a Viking tape deck that lacked
>> any electronics; it was made to be plugged directly into an
>> [integrated] amplifier (or preamp).
>
> I remember that deck -- and I remember Knight electronics that had a
> tape-head input. Tape-head inputs were not common.

Yes; you could buy assembled Knight stuff or "Knight-Kits". I had their
70-watt stereo amplifier (yes, integrated); great piece of audio
equipment. Too bad it was stolen (probably by my heroin-using neighbor)
in 19-ought-73; I'd probably be using it today.


--
You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.

- a Usenet "apology"
From: mm on 16 Feb 2010 17:27
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:09:04 +0000 (UTC), "Geoffrey S. Mendelson"
<gsm(a)cable.mendelson.com> wrote:

>
>--
>Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel gsm(a)mendelson.com N3OWJ/4X1GM
>New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or
>understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation.
>i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia.

That sounds like me! I may use your word, which I assume you intend
for the public domain. (I"ve never heard of a private word that was
announced in public.)
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Work at Home- Earn $4,000 Weekly With Email Reading Jobs
Next: 1/4 inch socket with isolated switch/es