From: Joerg on
Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:20:16 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Jim Thompson wrote:
> [snip]
>>> Block, or timber construction?
>>>
>> Timber.
>>
>>
>>> I used a jack to hold up a row of blocks, inserted a steel "T-beam",
>>> then added ductwork from there thru a clothes closet to the furnace/AC
>>> closet.
>>>
>> Ain't that easy here. Just about every wall is windows, or chimney, or
>> some other functional type. The only places where there would be cutting
>> opportunity is from two different attics into the hallway and into the
>> living room. But having a swamp cooler in there with the occasional
>> standing water will attract rodents, and pronto. Don't want those in there.
>
> Standing water ?? The only "water" would be in the swamp cooler, and
> that's external to the house.
>

That would require the thing to be on the roof and I won't do that.
Looks ugly and very tough to anchor for the high winds here. We have a
metal roof on a batten system, not geared for such loads.

>>
>>> Then enclosed the clothes closet ductwork with plywood, and carpeted
>>> it. Looked like it was done originally like that... as a raised shoe
>>> shelf ;-)
>>>
>> The walk-in closets are another oppportunity but it would just blow into
>> clothes, not the living room. And SWMBO wouldn't like that anyhow.
>
> You don't have supply yards, like we do around here, where you can buy
> pre-formed ductwork, and all the sheet-metal fittings to tie it all
> together?
>
> Actually I had three custom pieces made... adapter from cooler to
> 30"x8" duct, 6'x30"x8" duct, and adapter from there thru the "cut-off
> slide" into the house ductwork.
>

Oh, I can either buy that or bend it myself. But it's not really
possible, those walk-ins are tiny, it is a 40 year old house. Well,
Europeans would say I am out of my mind calling those tiny but ...

What I really don't understand is why there is nearly zero innovation in
this business. They are still sloshing a felt belt around or dripping
water on some sort of Aspen concoction. I mean, ultrasonic misters
aren't exactly new, why don't they use stuff like that? I bet one could
design a slick very flat unit around that, not those ugly big boxes.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: krw on
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:09:05 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:43:44 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>>Damon Hill wrote:
>>> Here in the Pacific Northwet, it's struggling to get into the
>>> 60s and sunshine has been a scarce commodity so far this year.
>>> That's supposed to change in a big way in a few days--summer
>>> at last! There's still over five feet of snow on the ground
>>> at Paradise on Mt. Rainier. (Actually, it's compressed slush.)
>>>
>>> http://www.cascadeclimber.com/web_cams.htm
>>>
>>> This time last year we were in the upper 90s and set an all-time
>>> record high of 102F. So I'm not complaining.
>>>
>>> I rather like Hebrew Nation brand dogs, but the best hot dog I ever
>>> had were Kominski Park.
>>>
>>
>>I ate the very best burger I ever had while on a long drive on Saturday.
>>If you ever have to do the whole I-5 stretch, it's the Black Bear Diner
>>in Willows (between Redding and Sacramento). Li'l mom and pop place,
>>very small village, everyone seemed to know everyone else there. $7.99,
>>still drooling ...
>
>I80 yesterday: we left Truckee at 5PM. It peaked at 103F in Roseville,
>down to 56 in San Francisco. Approaching the Bay, the gradient exceeds
>1 degree F per mile.

What's the gradient? At a 6% grade, the adiabatic lapse rate is about 1-3/4
degree F per mile. ;-)

>There's still snow on the hills up there. Boreal will be open for
>skiing next weekend.

It's been absolutely beautiful here for the past for or five days. It's in
the high 80s to low 90s and dry, which is *not* normal here.

From: Joerg on
krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:09:05 -0700, John Larkin
> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:43:44 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Damon Hill wrote:
>>>> Here in the Pacific Northwet, it's struggling to get into the
>>>> 60s and sunshine has been a scarce commodity so far this year.
>>>> That's supposed to change in a big way in a few days--summer
>>>> at last! There's still over five feet of snow on the ground
>>>> at Paradise on Mt. Rainier. (Actually, it's compressed slush.)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cascadeclimber.com/web_cams.htm
>>>>
>>>> This time last year we were in the upper 90s and set an all-time
>>>> record high of 102F. So I'm not complaining.
>>>>
>>>> I rather like Hebrew Nation brand dogs, but the best hot dog I ever
>>>> had were Kominski Park.
>>>>
>>> I ate the very best burger I ever had while on a long drive on Saturday.
>>> If you ever have to do the whole I-5 stretch, it's the Black Bear Diner
>>> in Willows (between Redding and Sacramento). Li'l mom and pop place,
>>> very small village, everyone seemed to know everyone else there. $7.99,
>>> still drooling ...
>> I80 yesterday: we left Truckee at 5PM. It peaked at 103F in Roseville,
>> down to 56 in San Francisco. Approaching the Bay, the gradient exceeds
>> 1 degree F per mile.
>
> What's the gradient? At a 6% grade, the adiabatic lapse rate is about 1-3/4
> degree F per mile. ;-)
>

From Roseville to S.F. it's next to nothing, except for a bunch of hills
that need to be crossed at the end it's all flat.

[...]

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: John Larkin on
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:53:09 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
wrote:

>krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:09:05 -0700, John Larkin
>> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:43:44 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Damon Hill wrote:
>>>>> Here in the Pacific Northwet, it's struggling to get into the
>>>>> 60s and sunshine has been a scarce commodity so far this year.
>>>>> That's supposed to change in a big way in a few days--summer
>>>>> at last! There's still over five feet of snow on the ground
>>>>> at Paradise on Mt. Rainier. (Actually, it's compressed slush.)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cascadeclimber.com/web_cams.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> This time last year we were in the upper 90s and set an all-time
>>>>> record high of 102F. So I'm not complaining.
>>>>>
>>>>> I rather like Hebrew Nation brand dogs, but the best hot dog I ever
>>>>> had were Kominski Park.
>>>>>
>>>> I ate the very best burger I ever had while on a long drive on Saturday.
>>>> If you ever have to do the whole I-5 stretch, it's the Black Bear Diner
>>>> in Willows (between Redding and Sacramento). Li'l mom and pop place,
>>>> very small village, everyone seemed to know everyone else there. $7.99,
>>>> still drooling ...
>>> I80 yesterday: we left Truckee at 5PM. It peaked at 103F in Roseville,
>>> down to 56 in San Francisco. Approaching the Bay, the gradient exceeds
>>> 1 degree F per mile.
>>
>> What's the gradient? At a 6% grade, the adiabatic lapse rate is about 1-3/4
>> degree F per mile. ;-)
>>
>
>From Roseville to S.F. it's next to nothing, except for a bunch of hills
> that need to be crossed at the end it's all flat.
>
>[...]

Right. It's the ice-cold water off the coast that cools us off.

I experimentally determined that the delta-T with altitude, going up
the western side of the Sierra, is about 1 deg F per 300 feet, right
around KRW's number.

John

From: Joerg on
John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:53:09 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:09:05 -0700, John Larkin
>>> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:43:44 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Damon Hill wrote:
>>>>>> Here in the Pacific Northwet, it's struggling to get into the
>>>>>> 60s and sunshine has been a scarce commodity so far this year.
>>>>>> That's supposed to change in a big way in a few days--summer
>>>>>> at last! There's still over five feet of snow on the ground
>>>>>> at Paradise on Mt. Rainier. (Actually, it's compressed slush.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cascadeclimber.com/web_cams.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This time last year we were in the upper 90s and set an all-time
>>>>>> record high of 102F. So I'm not complaining.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I rather like Hebrew Nation brand dogs, but the best hot dog I ever
>>>>>> had were Kominski Park.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I ate the very best burger I ever had while on a long drive on Saturday.
>>>>> If you ever have to do the whole I-5 stretch, it's the Black Bear Diner
>>>>> in Willows (between Redding and Sacramento). Li'l mom and pop place,
>>>>> very small village, everyone seemed to know everyone else there. $7.99,
>>>>> still drooling ...
>>>> I80 yesterday: we left Truckee at 5PM. It peaked at 103F in Roseville,
>>>> down to 56 in San Francisco. Approaching the Bay, the gradient exceeds
>>>> 1 degree F per mile.
>>> What's the gradient? At a 6% grade, the adiabatic lapse rate is about 1-3/4
>>> degree F per mile. ;-)
>>>
>>From Roseville to S.F. it's next to nothing, except for a bunch of hills
>> that need to be crossed at the end it's all flat.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Right. It's the ice-cold water off the coast that cools us off.
>
> I experimentally determined that the delta-T with altitude, going up
> the western side of the Sierra, is about 1 deg F per 300 feet, right
> around KRW's number.
>

I remember my young days when I royally messed that up. Was tired,
stopped the car which also seemed somewhat tired, pitched my tent, had a
couple of brewskys, went to sleep. Woke up around 4:00am and almost
froze my butt off.

The wee detail I had overlooked was a wee sign with the word "summit" on
there. That also explained why the car had lost so much power. I never
made that mistake again.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.