Prev: Wabash Live
Next: Help with a 1960's era drawing call out...
From: Cliff on 11 Dec 2009 07:41
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:39:32 -0800 (PST), Joe788 <larryrozer(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>Esprit has it all over Mastercam

It's been about a year since you were dumping those 100+
seats of Pro-E there at Qualcomm in San Diego and installing UG instead. Plus
the MasterCAM. Because you cannot learn how to drill holes.

How did that all work out?
--
Cliff
From: Joe788 on 12 Dec 2009 11:38
While losers who can't back up what they have to say continue to post
complete and utter bullshit and spin consider that the Jon Banquer
blog can always back it up with FACTS!

The Jon Banquer blog has added two new screen shots showing exactly
what Mastercam can't do and DP Technology Esprit can easily do with
very little effort on the users part. Is it any wonder that so many
machining job shops that use Mastercam are adding DP Technology
Esprit? The reason for this is straight forward and as simple as it
gets:

Mastercam can't get the job done like DP Technology Esprit can.

http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/dp-technology-esprit-vs-mastercam-x4/

How does your CADCAM system handle real world simulation tasks like
those that have been described and are now shown on the Jon Banquer
blog?

The Jon Banquer blog is the world leader in providing original CAM-
centric content. If you're not reading the Jon Banquer blog you can be
sure of one thing... your competition is! ;>)

http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/dp-technology-esprit-vs-mastercam-x4/

From: Joe788 on 12 Dec 2009 13:07
Tired of bullshit from losers who can't backup what they have to say
with facts and screen shots?

When you've had enough bullshit, spin, etc. suggest you check out the
Jon Banquer blog and find out why Mastercam fails miserably at doing
practical / real world multiple part simulation. New screen shots
added this morning show how easy it is to setup a tombstone and solid
cut part verify multiple parts in DP Technology Esprit with none of
the limitations that Mastercam has:

http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/dp-technology-esprit-vs-mastercam-x4/

"Mastercam requires you to join all your individual .STL parts so they
make up one connected piece. Mastercam won’t simulate separate .STL
files all at once. DP Esprit has no such ridiculous limitation.
Simulating a tombstone with many different parts on it is easy in DP
Technology Esprit. It’s a exercise in frustration in Mastercam and
isn’t practical by any stretch of the imagination."

You can only find this kind of information on the Jon Banquer blog.
The Jon Banquer blog is the leading CAM-centric blog on the internet.

http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/dp-technology-esprit-vs-mastercam-x4/

From: Joe788 on 13 Dec 2009 15:05
On Dec 12, 10:07 am, Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tired of bullshit from losers who can't backup what they have to say
> with facts and screen shots?
>
> When you've had enough bullshit, spin, etc. suggest you check out the
> Jon Banquer blog and find out why Mastercam fails miserably at doing
> practical / real world multiple part simulation. New screen shots
> added this morning show how easy it is to setup a tombstone and solid
> cut part verify multiple parts in DP Technology Esprit with none of
> the limitations that Mastercam has:
>
> http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/dp-technology-esprit-vs-mastercam-x4/
>
> "Mastercam requires you to join all your individual .STL parts so they
> make up one connected piece. Mastercam won’t simulate separate .STL
> files all at once. DP Esprit has no such ridiculous limitation.
> Simulating a tombstone with many different parts on it is easy in DP
> Technology Esprit. It’s a exercise in frustration in Mastercam and
> isn’t practical by any stretch of the imagination."
>
> You can only find this kind of information on the Jon Banquer blog.
> The Jon Banquer blog is the leading CAM-centric blog on the internet.
>
> http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/dp-technology-esprit-vs-mastercam-x4/

"FACTS"? Like the FACT that your "problem" with mask on arc was
completely self inflicted?

The FACT that you signed up a fake name on emastercam so you could
complain about Mastercam's inability to machine an open pocket, only
to be quickly rebuffed by people who actually know what they are
doing?

The FACT is that you are utterly helpless on virtually every aspect of
Mastercam.

If you spent 1/10th the time using and learning the software, as you
do complaining about it, you wouldn't have nearly so many complaints.
Then again, you are not even remotely sane, so who knows what would
happen.

Or are you talking about the FACT that you've been banned from all of
the popular machining related message boards numerous times, because
of your completely insane behavior?
From: Joe788 on 13 Dec 2009 17:52
Tired of bullshit from losers who can't backup what they have to say
with facts and screen shots?

When you've had enough bullshit, spin, etc. suggest you check out the
Jon Banquer blog and find out why Mastercam fails miserably at doing
practical / real world multiple part simulation. New screen shots
added this morning show how easy it is to setup a tombstone and solid
cut part verify multiple parts in DP Technology Esprit with none of
the limitations that Mastercam has:

http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/dp-technology-esprit-vs-mastercam-x4/

"Mastercam requires you to join all your individual .STL parts so they
make up one connected piece. Mastercam won’t simulate separate .STL
files all at once. DP Esprit has no such ridiculous limitation.
Simulating a tombstone with many different parts on it is easy in DP
Technology Esprit. It’s a exercise in frustration in Mastercam and
isn’t practical by any stretch of the imagination."

You can only find this kind of information on the Jon Banquer blog.
The Jon Banquer blog is the leading CAM-centric blog on the internet.

http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/dp-technology-esprit-vs-mastercam-x4/

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Wabash Live
Next: Help with a 1960's era drawing call out...