How can the subatomic spin and vibrate?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Anti matter and matter cannot be kept together
Next: College Algebra 5E Dugopolski Solutions Manual and test bank is available for purchase at affordable prices. Contact me at allsolutionmanuals11[at]gmail.com to buy it today.
From: BURT on 6 Jul 2010 13:56 On Jul 6, 8:43 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 5:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 7:17 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 5, 1:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Point mass can in no way rotate. Spin is for a changing size of > > > > rotation. Particles never rotate or have changes in size. > > > > > But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Nobody ever said a point particle had to rotate. > > > But they say Spin which is even more nonsensical. Spin is for changing > > sizes of rotation rate; like an ice skater pulling in her arms. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > A body does not need > > > to be rotating to possess angular momentum. > > Spin is an operator on a Hilbert space. It has nothing to do with > classical rotation.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yes. But that makes it nonsense. Mitch Raemsch
From: PD on 6 Jul 2010 17:34 On Jul 5, 12:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Point mass can in no way rotate. That's right. > Spin is for a changing size of > rotation. No, it's not. > Particles never rotate or have changes in size. Yes, but that doesn't have anything to do with quantum mechanical spin. Did you make any money today, Mitch? Have you had a decent meal? > > But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push. > > Mitch Raemsch
From: PD on 6 Jul 2010 17:35 On Jul 6, 12:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 8:43 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 5:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 5, 7:17 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 1:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Point mass can in no way rotate. Spin is for a changing size of > > > > > rotation. Particles never rotate or have changes in size. > > > > > > But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Nobody ever said a point particle had to rotate. > > > > But they say Spin which is even more nonsensical. Spin is for changing > > > sizes of rotation rate; like an ice skater pulling in her arms. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > A body does not need > > > > to be rotating to possess angular momentum. > > > Spin is an operator on a Hilbert space. It has nothing to do with > > classical rotation.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Yes. But that makes it nonsense. > > Mitch Raemsch No, it doesn't. It means it's a word that you recognize from somewhere else that is being used with a new and different definition. So the FIRST thing to do is to ask what this new and different definition of "spin" is, so that you will not continue to be confused. PD
From: Victar Shawnberger on 6 Jul 2010 17:46 On Jul 6, 11:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 12:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Point mass can in no way rotate. > > That's right. > > > Spin is for a changing size of > > rotation. > > No, it's not. > > > Particles never rotate or have changes in size. > > Yes, but that doesn't have anything to do with quantum mechanical > spin. > > Did you make any money today, Mitch? Have you had a decent meal? Sir, your aristocracy, i wish could understand appears that it has even less to do with quantum mechanics, which btw, is wrong > > > > > But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push. > > > Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 6 Jul 2010 17:49
On Jul 6, 2:35 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 12:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 6, 8:43 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 5, 5:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 7:17 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 5, 1:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Point mass can in no way rotate. Spin is for a changing size of > > > > > > rotation. Particles never rotate or have changes in size. > > > > > > > But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Nobody ever said a point particle had to rotate. > > > > > But they say Spin which is even more nonsensical. Spin is for changing > > > > sizes of rotation rate; like an ice skater pulling in her arms. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > A body does not need > > > > > to be rotating to possess angular momentum. > > > > Spin is an operator on a Hilbert space. It has nothing to do with > > > classical rotation.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Yes. But that makes it nonsense. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > No, it doesn't. It means it's a word that you recognize from somewhere > else that is being used with a new and different definition. So the > FIRST thing to do is to ask what this new and different definition of > "spin" is, so that you will not continue to be confused. > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You show me how a mathematical point particle can rotate. No. It doesn't happen. Mitch Raemsch |