From: Todd on 4 Jun 2010 20:08 On 06/04/2010 11:50 AM, John Hasler wrote: > Todd writes: >> I think he does have rcp. What would I need to do to the new server >> to get it to accept rcp? > > An rsh-server package. $ yum search rsh .... ========================= Matched: rsh ========================= .... rsh-server.i386 : Servers for remote access commands (rsh, rlogin, rcp). Thank you! -T p.s. and when I am done: rpm -e rsh-server
From: Darren Salt on 5 Jun 2010 16:00 I demand that Todd may or may not have written... > On 06/03/2010 10:43 AM, Robert Heller wrote: >> I'm assuming that the two machines are on some (private) LAN. If this >> must go over the public Internet, the OP should create a disposable >> (unprivilaged!) account on the newbox, and once the files have been >> transfered, disable that account and close up (or shutdown) vsftpd. > They will be inches from each other. I was hoping to avoid > having to set up ftpd on the new machine. netcat is an option. Receiving: netcat -l -p $PORT -q 0 >$FILE Sending: tar c $FILES | netcat $HOST $PORT -q 0 (Substitute $... appropriately.) -- | Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Toon | using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds ,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | back! | + Use more efficient products. Use less. BE MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT. Pessimist - half empty; optimist - half full; engineer - wrong size glass.
From: John Hasler on 5 Jun 2010 16:18 Darren Salt writes: > netcat is an option. He almost certainly does not have netcat on a Caldera box. However, he says he does have rcp, so he's got it made. -- John Hasler jhasler(a)newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA
From: Kenny McCormack on 5 Jun 2010 16:58 In article <877hmd9qs4.fsf(a)thumper.dhh.gt.org>, John Hasler <jhasler(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >Darren Salt writes: >> netcat is an option. > >He almost certainly does not have netcat on a Caldera box. However, he >says he does have rcp, so he's got it made. The point, which I have made repeatedly in this thread, is that if he has *anything* that allows him to copy a file onto the box (ftp, serial connection, sneaker net, smoke signals, whatever), then he can have netcat on the box. And once he has netcat, he's got it made. -- (This discussion group is about C, ...) Wrong. It is only OCCASIONALLY a discussion group about C; mostly, like most "discussion" groups, it is off-topic Rorsharch [sic] revelations of the childhood traumas of the participants...
From: Dave U. Random on 5 Jun 2010 18:46
"T" =3D=3D Todd <t...(a)invalid.com>: T> On 06/03/2010 09:31 AM, unruh wrote: T>=20 T> >Yee gads. Imagine doing this for 10000 files with most being binary T> >files, with potential file corruption problems. T> >It is like using a nailfile to tear down an office block. T>=20 T> No ssh either If all else fails, pipe 'tar''s output to 'od' to get a 7-bit data stream= : - Log on the ancient box using 'telnet', making sure the session output i= s saved on the new box (ie. enable logging). - Produce a TAR archive of the desired directory(ies), and use 'od' to produce output from it that will survive non 8-bit clean telnet session= |