From: Todd on
On 06/04/2010 11:50 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> Todd writes:
>> I think he does have rcp. What would I need to do to the new server
>> to get it to accept rcp?
>
> An rsh-server package.


$ yum search rsh
....
========================= Matched: rsh =========================
....
rsh-server.i386 : Servers for remote access commands (rsh, rlogin, rcp).

Thank you!

-T

p.s. and when I am done:
rpm -e rsh-server
From: Darren Salt on
I demand that Todd may or may not have written...

> On 06/03/2010 10:43 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> I'm assuming that the two machines are on some (private) LAN. If this
>> must go over the public Internet, the OP should create a disposable
>> (unprivilaged!) account on the newbox, and once the files have been
>> transfered, disable that account and close up (or shutdown) vsftpd.

> They will be inches from each other. I was hoping to avoid
> having to set up ftpd on the new machine.

netcat is an option.

Receiving:
netcat -l -p $PORT -q 0 >$FILE

Sending:
tar c $FILES | netcat $HOST $PORT -q 0

(Substitute $... appropriately.)

--
| Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds ,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | back!
| + Use more efficient products. Use less. BE MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT.

Pessimist - half empty; optimist - half full; engineer - wrong size glass.
From: John Hasler on
Darren Salt writes:
> netcat is an option.

He almost certainly does not have netcat on a Caldera box. However, he
says he does have rcp, so he's got it made.
--
John Hasler
jhasler(a)newsguy.com
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
From: Kenny McCormack on
In article <877hmd9qs4.fsf(a)thumper.dhh.gt.org>,
John Hasler <jhasler(a)newsguy.com> wrote:
>Darren Salt writes:
>> netcat is an option.
>
>He almost certainly does not have netcat on a Caldera box. However, he
>says he does have rcp, so he's got it made.

The point, which I have made repeatedly in this thread, is that if he
has *anything* that allows him to copy a file onto the box (ftp, serial
connection, sneaker net, smoke signals, whatever), then he can have
netcat on the box. And once he has netcat, he's got it made.

--
(This discussion group is about C, ...)

Wrong. It is only OCCASIONALLY a discussion group
about C; mostly, like most "discussion" groups, it is
off-topic Rorsharch [sic] revelations of the childhood
traumas of the participants...

From: Dave U. Random on
"T" =3D=3D Todd <t...(a)invalid.com>:
T> On 06/03/2010 09:31 AM, unruh wrote:
T>=20
T> >Yee gads. Imagine doing this for 10000 files with most being binary
T> >files, with potential file corruption problems.
T> >It is like using a nailfile to tear down an office block.
T>=20
T> No ssh either

If all else fails, pipe 'tar''s output to 'od' to get a 7-bit data stream=
:

- Log on the ancient box using 'telnet', making sure the session output i=
s
saved on the new box (ie. enable logging).
- Produce a TAR archive of the desired directory(ies), and use 'od' to
produce output from it that will survive non 8-bit clean telnet session=