How will the universe end?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Sci-fi elementar particles as clogged rubberbands stretched over surface
Next: SR/GR use absolute time to synchronize the GPS clocks with the ground clock.
From: THE BORG on 20 Mar 2010 01:19 When the Great God Shiva opens his Third Eye he will destroy the Universe.
From: Christopher A. Lee on 20 Mar 2010 01:47 On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:30:19 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >God does not need to prove that He exists. Where is anybody demanding it do that, imbecile? Do you honestly not understand we are telling believers to either put up or shut up? Or do you psychos think YOU are God? Or are you being just plain dishonest again? >Mitch Raemsch
From: Kadaitcha Man on 20 Mar 2010 01:56 "Christopher A. Lee", thou swag-bellied jealous rascally knave. A pox damn you, you muddy rascal, is that all the comfort you bring me. Ye guffawed: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:30:19 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> > wrote: > >>God does not need to prove that He exists. > > Where is anybody demanding it do that, imbecile? Right here... > Do you honestly not understand we are telling believers to either put up > or shut up? The irony escapes you, hey. -- I have defined no god. And when I do need to define some god for the purposes of discussing its nature with atheists I always define the supposed some god in the very same concrete and arbitrary terms, without variation: God = Metaphysical X Watching you idiot atheists witlessly pinning your own lunatic assumptions and irrational perceptions onto it then attempting to argue against your very own deranged Frankenstein-like creation with utterly b0rked illogic is a never-ending source of great hilarity.
From: Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet on 20 Mar 2010 02:24 On Mar 19, 9:59 pm, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: > On Mar 19, 6:46 am, HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > But that's not the end, according to University of Michigan > > astrophysicist Fred Adams. An expert on the fate of the cosmos and co- > > author with Greg Laughlin of The Five Ages of the Universe (Touchstone Tumble along with the pulsating galaxeswhich had no beginning nor has no end. So, now you know. PLU & WOMP WOMP Tom > > Books; 2000), Adams predicts that all this dead matter will eventually > > collapse into black holes. By the time the universe is 1 trillion > > trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years old, the black > > holes themselves will disintegrate into stray particles, which will > > bind loosely to form individual "atoms" larger than the size of > > today's universe. Eventually, even these will decay, leaving a > > featureless, infinitely large void. > > >http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101010625/story.html > > You said it ACDC! I agree with Fred only I'd go one step further > pointing out the collapse into black holes with disintegration pretty > much describes the Obama administration. > The "end" is clearly near.
From: Painius on 20 Mar 2010 05:59
"BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:d6072f38-5b15-4dc1-abef-bc8650318670(a)t17g2000prg.googlegroups.com... On Mar 19, 3:31 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...(a)io.com> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:40:33 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> > wrote: > > On Mar 19, 1:35?pm, unviable tissue mass <perryneh...(a)hotmail.com> > > wrote: > >> This discussion must include the "MULTIVERSE" concept, which astro- > >> folks are touting as a possible add-on to our knowledge of time and > >> space, which many believe has no beginning and no end. > > >> And certainly no "creator." > > > No. There is only one universe just as there is only one Creator. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > ...and if you believe that, take it to some other newsgroup that will > tolerate your refusal to abide by alt.atheism's preferences. > > -- > Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patr...(a)io.com) Houston, Texas > www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273 > LAST GAME: Rockford 3, Houston 2 (SO, March 14) > NEXT GAME: Saturday, March 20 vs. Milwaukee, 7:35 God does not need to prove that He exists. Mitch Raemsch $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ You are so right, Mitch! God does not need to prove that she (oops) he exists. And atheists do not need to prove that God does not exist. Atheists just compare the odds. And you might want to do that, too, Mitch... Let's say that there are only two religions in the whole world. Then you would have a 50-50 chance of being right. That's a 1 out of 2 chance, or 1/2. Pretty good odds. If there were only three religions in the world, then you would have a 33 1/3 chance of being right. That's a 1 out of 3 chance, or 1/3. From this it follows that a person who faithfully practices their religion has a 1/n chance of being right, where "n" equals the total number of religions in the world. Now, how many religions are actually going on right now in the world? Tens? Tens of hundreds? Hundreds? Hundreds of religions? My goodness, even if there were only 100 religions in the whole world, you would only have a 1/100th of a chance that you would be right. That *has* to keep you warm and comfortable on a cold, dark and lonely night! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_inconsistent_revelations#Systematic_description http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." > Carl Sagan P.P.S.: http://Astronomy.painellsworth.net http://PoisonFalls.painellsworth.net http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth |