Prev: Gravity lows mark burial sites of ancient tectonic plates
Next: Area next to active star-forming region is empty
From: V on 11 May 2010 16:30 On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:26:37 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell <fatherhaskell(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On May 11, 1:39�pm, HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Here it is......... >> >> We nuke the leak. >> >> A five megaton nuke should get the job done. >> >> Like cauterizing a bleeding vein. >> >> Problem solved. > >That just blows the lid off the well and makes an even >bigger spill, sort of like popping a zit. Maybe BP should take the staff of the University of East Anglia and stuff them down the hole. At least they'd bloat & expand under water.
From: Xan Du on 11 May 2010 16:37 On 5/11/2010 3:34 PM, Hagar wrote: > "Xan Du"<xan747(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hscbcv$4ol$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> On 5/11/2010 3:22 PM, HardySpicer wrote: >>> On May 12, 5:39 am, HVAC<mr.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Here it is......... >>>> >>>> We nuke the leak. >>>> >>>> A five megaton nuke should get the job done. >>>> >>>> Like cauterizing a bleeding vein. >>>> >>>> Problem solved. >>> >>> Yep and the East coast of the US while we're at it. Two problems >>> solved at once. >> >> Here's a fun game. Let's all pick the one state we'd most like to nuke, >> and why. Repeats are ok, but let's see if we can get at least one vote >> for each state. >> >> I'll start. Utah. As the resident ex-Mormon in a.a., this should be >> obvious. >> >> -Xan >> > > Let's start with China, then, because you multiply like rats. > > Bzzzt. The world population growth rate is 1.17% annually. China's growth rate is between 0.58% and 0.66% depending on whose estimate you look at. Compare to the US, which is just under the world average at about 1% annual growth. -Xan
From: Bast on 11 May 2010 17:51 Brad Guth wrote: > On May 11, 11:46 am, UseNetO...(a)t-online.de wrote: >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT), HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> A five megaton nuke should get the job done. >> >> No, you need just four megatons: >> One megaton for Texas, one for Louisiana, one for Alabama, one for >> Florida, would be enough. > > But we need to make those as false flagged, so that only Muslims get > blamed. > > ~ BG Actually I think the CIA claim those four states are harboring terrorists, so fair game. (Bush lives in Texas, right ?) Besides if all the fuss is about a little oil lapping up on a beach. If you move the beaches back, oh say, 250 -300 miles. That should solve the problem for a few weeks at least
From: Bast on 11 May 2010 17:57 His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises wrote: > On May 11, 2:51 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 11, 11:46 am, UseNetO...(a)t-online.de wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT), HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >> >>>> A five megaton nuke should get the job done. >> >>> No, you need just four megatons: >>> One megaton for Texas, one for Louisiana, one for Alabama, one for >>> Florida, would be enough. >> >> But we need to make those as false flagged, so that only Muslims get >> blamed. >> >> ~ BG > > The oil spill was a sign of God for the Christians. I hope they know > how to interpret it. I'm actually surprised no one has posted a photoshopped google earth satellite shot yet, with the face of "XXXXX" in the oil slick. .....And then try to sell it on Ebay. <g>
From: Brad Guth on 11 May 2010 18:10
On May 11, 2:57 pm, "Bast" <faken...(a)nomail.invalid> wrote: > His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana and Chief of Quixotic > > > > Enterprises wrote: > > On May 11, 2:51 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On May 11, 11:46 am, UseNetO...(a)t-online.de wrote: > > >>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT), HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > > >>>> A five megaton nuke should get the job done. > > >>> No, you need just four megatons: > >>> One megaton for Texas, one for Louisiana, one for Alabama, one for > >>> Florida, would be enough. > > >> But we need to make those as false flagged, so that only Muslims get > >> blamed. > > >> ~ BG > > > The oil spill was a sign of God for the Christians. I hope they know > > how to interpret it. > > I'm actually surprised no one has posted a photoshopped google earth > satellite shot yet, with the face of "XXXXX" in the oil slick. > ....And then try to sell it on Ebay. <g> The face of OBL might get some media attention. ~ BG |