From: Yap on
On 12 Mei, 00:39, HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Here it is.........
>
> We nuke the leak.
>
> A five megaton nuke should get the job done.
>
> Like cauterizing a bleeding vein.
>
> Problem solved.

Good, you should have no problem in getting all the oil under there.
It could help the US economy.
From: Yap on
On 12 Mei, 02:12, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana
and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises" <nolionnoprob...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 11, 2:51 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 11, 11:46 am, UseNetO...(a)t-online.de wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT), HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >A five megaton nuke should get the job done.
>
> > > No, you need just four megatons:
> > > One megaton for Texas, one for Louisiana, one for Alabama, one for
> > > Florida, would be enough.
>
> > But we need to make those as false flagged, so that only Muslims get
> > blamed.
>
> >  ~ BG
>
> The oil spill was a sign of God for the Christians. I hope they know
> how to interpret it.

Nah, when comes to bad things, they could not agree it was god's work.
They only pick nice, sweet cherry and discard all the rotten one.
From: Yap on
On 12 Mei, 02:22, HardySpicer <gyansor...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 5:39 am, HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Here it is.........
>
> > We nuke the leak.
>
> > A five megaton nuke should get the job done.
>
> > Like cauterizing a bleeding vein.
>
> > Problem solved.
>
> Yep and the East coast of the US while we're at it. Two problems
> solved at once.
And have all the conservative die hard Christians gone as well?
>
> Hardy

From: Yap on
On 12 Mei, 02:34, "Hagar" <ha...(a)sahm.name> wrote:
> "Xan Du" <xan...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:hscbcv$4ol$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>
> > On 5/11/2010 3:22 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
> >> On May 12, 5:39 am, HVAC<mr.h...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>> Here it is.........
>
> >>> We nuke the leak.
>
> >>> A five megaton nuke should get the job done.
>
> >>> Like cauterizing a bleeding vein.
>
> >>> Problem solved.
>
> >> Yep and the East coast of the US while we're at it. Two problems
> >> solved at once.
>
> > Here's a fun game.  Let's all pick the one state we'd most like to nuke,
> > and why.  Repeats are ok, but let's see if we can get at least one vote
> > for each state.
>
> > I'll start.  Utah.  As the resident ex-Mormon in a.a., this should be
> > obvious.
>
> > -Xan
>
> Let's start with China, then, because you multiply like rats.

Hey, we are trying to solve the US problem, why do you drag other
country into it?
You must be a racist and a neocon, can't stand for the decline of US.

You don't blame yourself but others for all your ills?
You must be a sick nut.
From: Yap on
On 12 Mei, 02:50, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 11, 12:43 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 3:34 pm, "Hagar" <ha...(a)sahm.name> wrote:
>
> > > "Xan Du" <xan...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:hscbcv$4ol$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> > > > On 5/11/2010 3:22 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
> > > >> On May 12, 5:39 am, HVAC<mr.h...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
> > > >>> Here it is.........
>
> > > >>> We nuke the leak.
>
> > > >>> A five megaton nuke should get the job done.
>
> > > >>> Like cauterizing a bleeding vein.
>
> > > >>> Problem solved.
>
> > > >> Yep and the East coast of the US while we're at it. Two problems
> > > >> solved at once.
>
> > > > Here's a fun game.  Let's all pick the one state we'd most like to nuke,
> > > > and why.  Repeats are ok, but let's see if we can get at least one vote
> > > > for each state.
>
> > > > I'll start.  Utah.  As the resident ex-Mormon in a.a., this should be
> > > > obvious.
>
> > > > -Xan
>
> > > Let's start with China, then, because you multiply like rats.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > China is best for we owe these commies big bucks    Trebert
>
> They'll only make us pay double, plus interest.  Besides, we don't
> have enough nukes to kill them all, especially when those in charge
> are seldom in China to begin with.  Thanks to this internet, the true
> wealth and power of China can be remote managed from anywhere on
> Earth, or even from orbit.
Yes, but why do US issue government bonds?
Without China, your bonds are worth nothing since no country can have
that much to subscribe to.
>
>  ~ BG