I can't be happy
in [UK Mac]
|
Prev: USB to 9pinD serial adapters?
Next: Google Translate
From: Chris Ridd on 16 Feb 2010 04:36 On 2010-02-16 09:18:03 +0000, Jaimie Vandenbergh said: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:00:59 +0000, me9(a)privacy.net (Bella Jones) > wrote: > >> I've been guilty of circumventing my kill >> file and popping over to the google groups site to read the latest >> nuttery > > Can Unison not pull in the killed post (overriding filters) if you > show all headers, then doubleclick on the appropriate message-ID > towards the tail of the References: header? Good idea, but Unison is more clever/stupid (delete as appropriate) than that. The references header shows messages that Unison can show as double-clickable hyperlinks, and messages that Unison won't show as plain text. -- Chris
From: D.M. Procida on 16 Feb 2010 05:00 zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > The only reason I'm not offended by your timing is because, well, it's > you and I'd expect nothing less. There is nothing wrong with airing your > views over IVF funding, but to do so when someone is celebrating success > shows a distinct lack of tact and understanding of social interaction. > It also seems like a (thus far successful) jealous attempt to divert the > attention away from the celebratory discussions and onto yourself. It really is time to leave this debate and enjoy what you've achieved, so you don't risk having the enjoyment soured. You know it's not a morally simple area, and we know you know that because we know you are an intelligent and reflective person. People who are absolutely sure about's what right are the most ghastly zealots, anyway. So you shouldn't feel compelled to answer. Daniele
From: David Kennedy on 16 Feb 2010 08:26 zoara wrote: > Rowland McDonnell<real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > >> My moral sensibilities are, for example, of such a degree of fineness >> and depth that you're utterly incopable of understanding the first >> thing >> about my version of morality (or ethics). > > What makes you think I don't understand it? You've made your > black-and-white judgements abundantly clear, and it's really not hard to > understand. If you COULD understand then I'm fairly sure that you'd STOP responding. -- David Kennedy http://www.anindianinexile.com
From: zoara on 16 Feb 2010 13:20 Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > Hate to say it Zoara, and I understand why, but you really are feeding > the troll. I know, I know. I felt it was worthwhile. Talking of naive... Zipped now, apologies all. -z- -- email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm
From: James Jolley on 16 Feb 2010 15:06
On 2010-02-16 09:00:59 +0000, me9(a)privacy.net (Bella Jones) said: > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > >> zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: >> >>> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > [...] >>> It also seems like a (thus far successful) jealous attempt to divert the >>> attention away from the celebratory discussions and onto yourself. >> >> >> Hate to say it Zoara, and I understand why, but you really are feeding >> the troll. > > Ditto. Please guys, can't you just ignore him? I know there's a scab > picking fun to all this, and I've been guilty of circumventing my kill > file and popping over to the google groups site to read the latest > nuttery, but it really serves nothing. > > You are effectively talking to a computer programme for all he cares > about your responses. All he wants is attention. Fair enough, I'd only just got to this one. Only backing up Z as he's been fair to me in the past. |