I'm so proud, I weaned someone off a P&S to a DSLR!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Immigration: The shocking truth about the immigrants who openedthe floodgates
Next: The real cost of being sued by Getty
From: Pete D on 19 Oct 2009 04:28 Awesome dude, took you four posts before you changed your nym.
From: Bob Larter on 19 Oct 2009 08:04 DRS wrote: > "Bob Larter" <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:4adbf5b1$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au > > [...] > >> I don't have the slightest problem with people who prefer a P&S to a >> DSLR. The bit that confuses me is why they feel the need to post about >> P&Ses to a *DSLR specific* newsgroup. > > Bob, Bob, Bob. The answer lies in your own signature. You could be right. Sometimes, people are just fuckwits. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
From: The Asinine DSLR-Troll Brigade on 19 Oct 2009 08:52 On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:04:36 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote: >DRS wrote: >> "Bob Larter" <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:4adbf5b1$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au >> >> [...] >> >>> I don't have the slightest problem with people who prefer a P&S to a >>> DSLR. The bit that confuses me is why they feel the need to post about >>> P&Ses to a *DSLR specific* newsgroup. >> >> Bob, Bob, Bob. The answer lies in your own signature. > >You could be right. Sometimes, people are just fuckwits. Proving that neither of you have one lick of intellect (nor how to even use something as simple as a mirror). You need look no further than any DSLR-Troll that doesn't have a clue about photography and cross-posts to make you DSLR-Trolls eventually look like the completely asinine fools that you really are. Therein lies your real answer. Catch up! Oh, but that's right, you can't. I love how DSLR-Trolls keep proving to the world that they can't think clearly. After all, their camera and lens choices alone prove that. I've yet to see even ONE intelligent post made by even ONE DSLR proponent. I LOVE IT! Headline: Fools and Idiots Buy DSLRs! Proved Daily on Usenet, by Themselves! LOL!
From: John McWilliams on 19 Oct 2009 12:26 ray wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:14:23 +1000, Bob Larter wrote: >> I don't have the slightest problem with people who prefer a P&S to a >> DSLR. The bit that confuses me is why they feel the need to post about >> P&Ses to a *DSLR specific* newsgroup. > > Let me see: rec.photo.digital == DSLR - interesting hypothesis. ray- Do you not see that the post has been going to two NGs? Since the o.p.?? -- john mcwilliams
From: ray on 19 Oct 2009 13:16
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:26:54 -0700, John McWilliams wrote: > ray wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:14:23 +1000, Bob Larter wrote: > >>> I don't have the slightest problem with people who prefer a P&S to a >>> DSLR. The bit that confuses me is why they feel the need to post about >>> P&Ses to a *DSLR specific* newsgroup. >> >> Let me see: rec.photo.digital == DSLR - interesting hypothesis. > > ray- > > Do you not see that the post has been going to two NGs? Since the o.p.?? Yeah - I noticed. I've only read and responded here hence, IMHO, I'm not having a need to post to a dslr specific newsgroup. |