From: zoara on
Conor <conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote:
>
> So what was your claim again?

My claim was evidently missed by you during your frenzied attempts to
refute an argument I didn't actually make.

-z-


--
email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm
From: zoara on
R <me32(a)privacy.net> wrote:
> Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
> > I personally thnk it's the 'two men running away from a lion'
> > situation. You
> > don't have to run faster than the lion, you just have to run faster
> > than the
> > other guy.
>
> I like the analogy :)
>

I've always heard is as "You don't have to swim faster than the shark".
I wonder which was the original, and how it was coined.

-z-

--
email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm
From: zoara on
R <me32(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> Here's my highly speculative theory. Most malware is developed in the
> parts of the world where Macs are very rarely used. Places like
> Russia, (the) Ukraine, and China. To write malware requires extensive
> knowledge of the system you are attacking - the sort of knowledge
> that can't be acquired through occasional use. Moreover, most hackers
> tend to be fairly young. So they're going to attack the software they
> know the most about, and that will be the software they grew up
> using. That software will mainly be, in those countries, Windows.
>

Oooh, now there's a thought.

-z-

--
email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm
From: Jim on
On 2010-04-19, zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote:
> R <me32(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> Here's my highly speculative theory. Most malware is developed in the
>> parts of the world where Macs are very rarely used. Places like
>> Russia, (the) Ukraine, and China. To write malware requires extensive
>> knowledge of the system you are attacking - the sort of knowledge
>> that can't be acquired through occasional use. Moreover, most hackers
>> tend to be fairly young. So they're going to attack the software they
>> know the most about, and that will be the software they grew up
>> using. That software will mainly be, in those countries, Windows.
>>
>
> Oooh, now there's a thought.

I'm not convinced, though. As someone else pointed out, building a
Hackintosh isn't exactly hard nowadays, but you wouldn't even have to do
that - I expect someone has got OS X going well in a VM.

It could be though. Familiarity is a strong motivating factor, I guess.

Jim
--
Twitter:@GreyAreaUK
"[The MP4-12C] will be fitted with all manner of pointlessly shiny
buttons that light up and a switch that says 'sport mode' that isn't
connected to anything." The Daily Mash.
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:04:58 +0100, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com>
wrote:

>On 2010-04-19, zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>> R <me32(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's my highly speculative theory. Most malware is developed in the
>>> parts of the world where Macs are very rarely used. Places like
>>> Russia, (the) Ukraine, and China. To write malware requires extensive
>>> knowledge of the system you are attacking - the sort of knowledge
>>> that can't be acquired through occasional use. Moreover, most hackers
>>> tend to be fairly young. So they're going to attack the software they
>>> know the most about, and that will be the software they grew up
>>> using. That software will mainly be, in those countries, Windows.
>>>
>>
>> Oooh, now there's a thought.
>
>I'm not convinced, though. As someone else pointed out, building a
>Hackintosh isn't exactly hard nowadays, but you wouldn't even have to do
>that - I expect someone has got OS X going well in a VM.

I had 10.3 going in a PearPC G3-emulating VM before ever owning an OSX
Mac, so it's been possible for a loooong time.

>It could be though. Familiarity is a strong motivating factor, I guess.

Possibly also the feel amongst script-kiddies that Macs are toys and
not worth poking at? I dunno.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex."
-- Marvin the Martian
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: Low-res icons in Dock?
Next: iPod touch won't update?