Infinite vs. instant
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Simple and direct proof that the theoretical science of AGW is fraud and the product of the host of charlatans led by J Hansen includingno discusion Wormley
Next: COSMIC BULLET FIRED BY EXPLODING STAR
From: Sam Wormley on 27 May 2010 18:29 On 5/27/10 9:52 AM, GogoJF wrote: > Which is faster Planck time or c? Why are you trying compare a time interval with speed?
From: PD on 27 May 2010 18:31 On May 27, 4:14 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 27, 10:19 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > On May 27, 7:52 am, BozoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Which is faster Planck time or c? > > > LOL > > According to Wiki on Plank time: > It is the time required for light to travel, in a vacuum, a distance > of 1 Planck length. > According to Wiki on Planck length: > Unit of length, equal to 1.616252(81)×10-35 meters. > > Dono, shouldn't the answer to this question be that they are equally > as fast? Which is faster, 60 miles per hour, or one hour?
From: Sam Wormley on 27 May 2010 18:42 On 5/27/10 4:14 PM, GogoJF wrote: > On May 27, 10:19 am, "Dono."<sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> On May 27, 7:52 am, BozoJF<jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Which is faster Planck time or c? >> >> LOL > > According to Wiki on Plank time: > It is the time required for light to travel, in a vacuum, a distance > of 1 Planck length. > According to Wiki on Planck length: > Unit of length, equal to 1.616252(81)×10-35 meters. > > Dono, shouldn't the answer to this question be that they are equally > as fast? Planck Time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_time t_p = √(h-bar G / c^5) Planck Length http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length l_p = √(h-bar G / c^3) These units are consistent. l_p / t_p = √c^2 = c One can't compare units of time directly to units of speed, but one can say the the Planck length and time are related by the above equation.
From: GogoJF on 27 May 2010 19:07 On May 27, 5:29 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/27/10 9:52 AM, GogoJF wrote: > > > Which is faster Planck time or c? > > Why are you trying compare a time interval with speed? You are one who believes in mixing your lengths and your times inextricably- with relativity- your explanation of length contraction and time dilation is essentially comparisons of speeds and time intervals, are they not?
From: GogoJF on 27 May 2010 19:12
On May 27, 5:29 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/27/10 9:52 AM, GogoJF wrote: > > > Which is faster Planck time or c? > > Why are you trying compare a time interval with speed? What do think time dilation and length contraction are? |