From: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries on
David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Max Wachtel" <maxpro4u(a)hotmail.com>
>
>> The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and
>> his opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that
>> the pic was unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of
>> story.
>
>
> No, he received no warning. After the 1st post with the attached
> graphic, the post was removed.

For a normally intelligent person, the removal of the post would be warning
enough.

> After the 2cnd post, he was subsequently banned.

He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to
be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey


From: David H. Lipman on
From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk(a)earthling.net>

| David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "Max Wachtel" <maxpro4u(a)hotmail.com>

>>> The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and
>>> his opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that
>>> the pic was unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of
>>> story.


>> No, he received no warning. After the 1st post with the attached
>> graphic, the post was removed.

| For a normally intelligent person, the removal of the post would be warning
| enough.

>> After the 2cnd post, he was subsequently banned.

| He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

Not even an 'edge'.




--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: Dustin Cook on
"~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)nospam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
news:hslhqe$muv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:

>> No, he received no warning.
>
> Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning.

I mistakenly assumed that you would understand the picture being deleted
was a warning not to do it again. My bad. I will try to be much more
specific in exactly what I intend to say to you from here on out.

> A question for David Lipman - please advise - just *how* do you know
> that > this is an accurate picture of what happened? Dustin Cook ( a
> Malwarebytes employee?) said a while ago, incorrectly, that a warning
> *was* issued! Folk reading here need to know whose word they can
> trust!

Please read the comments I have already written above, slowly. Folk
should also understand that Malwarebytes has nothing whatsoever to do
with my posts here; and that I am a former employee, I have nothing
whatsoever to do with Malwarebytes other than being a happy end user
like the rest of you. BD clearly tries to make out more to a story than
what is actually true.

Thanks for your time, I know it's a total waste having to muddle thru
this BS.




--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh..
nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior

From: Jenn on
Dustin Cook wrote:
> "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)nospam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
> news:hslhqe$muv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:
>
>>> No, he received no warning.
>>
>> Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning.
>
> I mistakenly assumed that you would understand the picture being
> deleted was a warning not to do it again. My bad. I will try to be
> much more specific in exactly what I intend to say to you from here
> on out.

It's about time you let everyone know that Dave was telling the truth about
not getting a warning.


--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)


From: ~BD~ on
Jenn wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)nospam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
>> news:hslhqe$muv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>>> No, he received no warning.
>>>
>>> Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning.
>>
>> I mistakenly assumed that you would understand the picture being
>> deleted was a warning not to do it again. My bad. I will try to be
>> much more specific in exactly what I intend to say to you from here
>> on out.
>
> It's about time you let everyone know that Dave was telling the truth about
> not getting a warning.

I appreciate your support Jenn - folk need to appreciate that I *do*
tell the truth! :)

--
Dave