Prev: polynomial "primes vs composites" method
Next: Hawking and two times
From: Junoexpress on 17 Feb 2010 22:16
On Feb 17, 1:54 am, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> If you wish, I can concede the argument to you like I tried to do with
> William Hughes earlier.
> Ok?  You win.  Isn't that what you wanted?
> Argument over.
>
> James Harris

You are confused. I responded to your question. That's called an
answer, not an argument. If you're interested in knowledge you will
have learned something. Did you understand anything that William
Hughes or I said? Did you even try or did you just react mindlessly?


HTH,
M
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Prev: polynomial "primes vs composites" method
Next: Hawking and two times