JSH: Some history is the future
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 343.4: Gravitomagnetism, GravitoWeak Interaction, GravitoStrong Interaction, and Repulsive Combinations
Next: Quantum Gravity 343.5: Multiple Interaction Literature (Continued)
From: JSH on 29 Nov 2009 18:58 On Nov 29, 12:43 pm, Peter <pwoly...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 29, 10:22 am, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > So I didn't solve the TSP problem and did not prove P=NP. Oh well. > > Not a big deal. > > > James Harris > > Such a nonchalant attiutude for a person who holds the fate of the > entire world in his hands (giggle), although maybe, just maybe, after Well, pity me for daring to acknowledge error! And people wonder why it's so hard to do it? Because nasty people will insult you for doing it, that's why. These people simply hate. Making yourself vulnerable by acknowledging error is an invitation to them to kick you while you are down. They are dismal humans. > this your 50th (or is it the 500th) unsuccessful attempt, one might be > tempted to side with dear Uncle Al, who so poetically put it to you in You mean the robot? What makes you think his behavior is not predictable? > his classic "An Ode to James Harris" <deleted> I've read it before. James Harris
From: Mark Murray on 29 Nov 2009 19:41
JSH wrote: > Well, pity me for daring to acknowledge error! You? Challenge error? HAH! http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a2417f4c0d92865f/462c4f5a3329caf7?pli=1 JSH: "There is no point looking for errors there since there aren't any" (paraphrased). > And people wonder why it's so hard to do it? I Just wonder why its so hard for you to generalise the experience. You finally admitted that your TSP solution was an abject failure (never mind the "fact" that it was a proof). Now keep going. > Because nasty people will insult you for doing it, that's why. What about your own insults (the ones you haven't dealt with yet, even though your victims have been long vindicated). > These people simply hate. Making yourself vulnerable by acknowledging > error is an invitation to them to kick you while you are down. They > are dismal humans. Look in the mirror. >> this your 50th (or is it the 500th) unsuccessful attempt, one might be >> tempted to side with dear Uncle Al, who so poetically put it to you in > > You mean the robot? What makes you think his behavior is not > predictable? "The Robot" was right. You were wrong. Deal with it. > I've read it before. And you will do so again. And again &c, until you learn. M |