JSH: There is only one
in [Math]
|
Prev: Embedding a separable metric space in the Hilbert parallelotope
Next: Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 12 Jul 2010 23:49 JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> writes: > Ask him, is there a prime gap equation? I'll ask Christopher Lambert. -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: Mark Murray on 13 Jul 2010 03:58 On 13/07/2010 04:15, MichaelW wrote: > On Jul 13, 11:00 am, JSH<jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: : >> Yet my prime gap equation will still be the world's only. >> >> You see, there is only one. : > Your result (when done correctly) has been known since the late 19th > century. Here's an example: > > http://cnx.org/content/m12764/latest/ > > Your equation can be found under figure 1. The only difference is that > you use (p-2)/(p-1) whereas the author uses the more sensible (p-1)/p. > Also he understands the connection between the equation and natural > logarithms. James; you have been told this MANY times; yet you continually harp on about how original and unique "your" result is. In your "Trying to be fair" thread, you say <quote> People can quite deliberately choose to be wrong. And ignore all evidence. </quote> Are you choosing to be wrong or are you just blind to the facts? M -- Mark "No Nickname" Murray Notable nebbish, extreme generalist.
From: Tim Little on 13 Jul 2010 06:24 On 2010-07-13, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi> wrote: > JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> writes: >> You see, there is only one. > > There can be only one... Will all this at some point involve cutting off > some people's heads? Yes. With a HAMMER. - Tim
From: Mark Murray on 14 Jul 2010 02:27 On 14/07/2010 01:21, JSH wrote: >>> Your equation can be found under figure 1. The only difference is that > > I don't chase links. With a mind that narrow, its no wonder you don't learn anything. > Think about it: if I DID then any poster with a hostile agenda could > put up a link, say it was something important in a thread expecting > that out of curiosity I might try it, and I'd step into that trap. > > Use a mainstream source. What is "cnx.org"? And no ripping on me > insultingly in reply. I don't know. I don't trust you. In fact I > think you may be capable of evil against others. > > Understand? > > I'm emphasizing that I do not think you are a trustworthy person and > I'm not going to chase links that you put up which could be nasty > traps from an evil crappy person. Your paranoia is not my problem. M -- Mark "No Nickname" Murray Notable nebbish, extreme generalist.
From: MichaelW on 14 Jul 2010 02:47
On Jul 14, 4:27 pm, Mark Murray <w.h.o...(a)example.com> wrote: > On 14/07/2010 01:21, JSH wrote: > > >>> Your equation can be found under figure 1. The only difference is that > > > I don't chase links. > > With a mind that narrow, its no wonder you don't learn anything. > > > Think about it: if I DID then any poster with a hostile agenda could > > put up a link, say it was something important in a thread expecting > > that out of curiosity I might try it, and I'd step into that trap. > > > Use a mainstream source. What is "cnx.org"? And no ripping on me > > insultingly in reply. I don't know. I don't trust you. In fact I > > think you may be capable of evil against others. > > > Understand? > > > I'm emphasizing that I do not think you are a trustworthy person and > > I'm not going to chase links that you put up which could be nasty > > traps from an evil crappy person. > > Your paranoia is not my problem. > > M > -- > Mark "No Nickname" Murray > Notable nebbish, extreme generalist. To be fair to James I do understand. I have passed up on links from members of my own family when I had suspicions (of the link, not the family member). For example from experience we have a house rule; never follow a link in the .ru domain. Of course this does beg the question that given I have information that I think is relevant to the discussion but is not in a format easily transferred to plain text what format would James accept? And if he will not actually reference information relevant to his posts then why does he bother posting? Regards, Michael W. |