JSH: There is only one
in [Math]
|
Prev: Embedding a separable metric space in the Hilbert parallelotope
Next: Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian
From: JSH on 12 Jul 2010 21:00 Oh yeah, there are areas where I have the world's only of something, and one such area is with prime gaps. I have given the world's only prime gap equation. There is only one. Remarkably to me math people can be bizarre about their insistence on ignoring even dramatic mathematical discoveries--from people like me. But it doesn't matter. Soon enough they will be dust, and their petty behavior fodder for history to ponder. Their own "research" long forgotten as so much of it is useless, or they probably wouldn't be so stupidly petty as they are today. Only those with value can see value. Only those who have found value appreciate value. So they are an odd point in history, which will pass. Yet my prime gap equation will still be the world's only. You see, there is only one. James Harris
From: spudnik on 12 Jul 2010 21:25 yes, and prime gaps, sounds as if it could be related to prime frequencies -- yahoo! (tm) seriously, you're just talking about Venn diagrams; eh? > You see, there is only one. --BP's Next Bailout of Wall St. etc. ad vomitorium, Waxman's *new* cap&trade (circa '91). http://wlym.com
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 12 Jul 2010 21:35 JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> writes: > You see, there is only one. There can be only one... Will all this at some point involve cutting off some people's heads? -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: JSH on 12 Jul 2010 23:02 On Jul 12, 6:35 pm, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > You see, there is only one. > > There can be only one... Will all this at some point involve cutting off > some people's heads? Not by me. And I've pointed that out before. The world did not have a prime gap equation before I discovered one. There is only one prime gap equation. It's a perfect test. A perfect mathematical test. And what it has shown through the years is irrefutable, as human beings can be flawed and can SAY ANYTHING. So some Harvard math professor claims he cares about math? So what? Why believe him? Because society says so? Because you can't check him? Well I gave the way to check him. And every guy like him in every university around the world. Ask him, is there a prime gap equation? James Harris
From: MichaelW on 12 Jul 2010 23:15
On Jul 13, 11:00 am, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Oh yeah, there are areas where I have the world's only of something, > and one such area is with prime gaps. > > I have given the world's only prime gap equation. > > There is only one. > > Remarkably to me math people can be bizarre about their insistence on > ignoring even dramatic mathematical discoveries--from people like me. > > But it doesn't matter. Soon enough they will be dust, and their petty > behavior fodder for history to ponder. Their own "research" long > forgotten as so much of it is useless, or they probably wouldn't be so > stupidly petty as they are today. > > Only those with value can see value. Only those who have found value > appreciate value. > > So they are an odd point in history, which will pass. > > Yet my prime gap equation will still be the world's only. > > You see, there is only one. > > James Harris Your result (when done correctly) has been known since the late 19th century. Here's an example: http://cnx.org/content/m12764/latest/ Your equation can be found under figure 1. The only difference is that you use (p-2)/(p-1) whereas the author uses the more sensible (p-1)/p. Also he understands the connection between the equation and natural logarithms. Regards, Michael W. P.S. Please don't reply with one of those "I could not follow the maths therefore it is not the same" posts. |