Prev: Embedding a separable metric space in the Hilbert parallelotope
Next: Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian
From: Chum Ley on 15 Jul 2010 00:22

"JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a96dd2fa-230b-4db7-9205-488b4c0586d9(a)i18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 14, 1:18 am, Tim Little <t...(a)little-possums.net> wrote:
> On 2010-07-14, Mark Murray <w.h.o...(a)example.com> wrote:
>
> > Extreme lazinness and reluctance to follow up on salient evidence is
> > not a trait associated with "great discoverers".
>
> Maybe that's because all the previous great discoverers simply weren't
> great enough. The greatest of great discoverers can simply claim that
> their work is new and don't need to check whether it actually is or
> not. That fuss and bother belongs to mere mortals. Besides, you
> could have subverted the Web (and the public library) to create false
> references to previous work. You could do that by using his
> suppressed factoring result to break all their security systems.


>If a prime gap equation was accepted by most mathematicians as being
>known it'd be a crown jewel of number theory.

IF. there isnt, and its not.

>With it you could prove or disprove the Twin Primes conjecture for one
>thing, as well as an infinity of such conjectures. Are there an
>infinity of prime gaps of 4? The prime gap equation could answer that
>question.

your pge dosent work.

>So some Usenet posters saying, here is a link to a prime gap equation,
>is kind of suspicious in and of itself, given that the acceptance of
>one would generate world wide headlines.

wrong.

>It'd be one of the biggest events in the mathematical world of the
>century.

nope, it dosent work, and you will never be able to make it work.

<snip idiot drivilings>

James Harris


First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Embedding a separable metric space in the Hilbert parallelotope
Next: Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian