JSH: When your math is wrong
in [Math]
|
Prev: Numeric Mc^2. By Aiya-Oba
Next: math solution, fyi
From: Amy on 12 Jun 2010 22:41 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:f8209829-c477-4f91-8cec-7db18336f9b8(a)x27g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Jun 12, 3:44 pm, David Bernier <david...(a)videotron.ca> wrote: > JSH wrote: > > On Jun 11, 8:26 pm, Tim Little<t...(a)little-possums.net> wrote: > >> On 2010-06-11, JSH<jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> I've speculated that the math error actually selects out certain > >>> types of people who tolerate error--despite their denial. > > >> That displays more self-insight than usual for you. > > >> - Tim > > > Google (has to be Google): algebraic integers vs complex numbers > > > Oh and then reply ranting and raving about how Google search results > > are meaningless to explain away why a paper of mine is #1. > > > I'm not the nut. You people are hiding from that result. > > > Because it's a foundational level result which shreds your > > mathematical educations, so if you admit it's correct, what then? > > > ___JSH > > I don't think anybody knows the answer to that. > > David Bernier >Why not try to answer? Mathematics can be unique versus, say, my >degree in physics, which is just a B.Sc. Well the degree in Physics IS your problem, as physics only has 'wimpy' math, and it is not taught well. No wonder you don't understand much of it, and have so much trouble. >My degree in physics has to do with what humanity found WORKS. I suggest you should not advertize you have a degree in physics, as that gives people a poor impression of you. Besides you havent worked in Physics in over 15 years or more, or you never worked in that field at all. >And >we're surrounded by examples every day, including these computers and >networks over which we furiously trade insults. Physics had nothing to do with development of computers, dude. You cannot gain influence by saying you have a degree in physics and imply they made computers, you acquire only huge disgust. >The Google search is an objective reality from those networks. NO ! Google Lesson 101 - Google slants/spins all searches, and rankings for money and for pleasing current users so they stay using google. > The >world is voting all the time to generate search rankings. NO ! Google puts a spin on it and also makes up hits. Everyone knows that. >The result >emerges over worldwide competition. Posters put it down because it's >such a stark and unrelenting reality that our world is VERY >competitive. random poop >And despite the protestations of posters Google does not just give >away #1 search rank. Google presents whatever IT wants to to your computer, as they track you, and have you catagorized, try the same search at the publice libarary, it is NOT the same. <snip poo> >James Harris
From: JSH on 12 Jun 2010 23:14 On Jun 12, 7:01 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my- deja.com> wrote: > On Jun 11, 7:51 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > The real underlying problem is that years ago I found a foundational > > error in number theory. > > Yeah, sure. Let me guess. Prime Factorization Theorem, right? It's all > wrong. Courtesy of JSH. And of course you're not going to tell anyone > exactly what was that error for fear it would be stolen by some white > blue-eyed mathematician from MIT, the same one who stole the Prime > Numbers algorithm, discovered by two Inverse 19 country boys. > > Da plot thickens. Google (has to be Google): algebraic integers vs complex numbers A paper of mine should come up #1. (If it doesn't I want to hear about it in reply and please give your country.) Seems the ring of algebraic integers has a fight with the field of complex numbers and directly contradicts it. Of course, you should know who ultimately wins that battle. But that fight shatters the dreams of a generation of mathematicians who it seems would rather be wrong--and live in a world where their training is "right"--than handle the mathematical truth. James Harris
From: MichaelW on 12 Jun 2010 23:21 On Jun 13, 1:14 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 12, 7:01 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my- > > deja.com> wrote: > > On Jun 11, 7:51 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The real underlying problem is that years ago I found a foundational > > > error in number theory. > > > Yeah, sure. Let me guess. Prime Factorization Theorem, right? It's all > > wrong. Courtesy of JSH. And of course you're not going to tell anyone > > exactly what was that error for fear it would be stolen by some white > > blue-eyed mathematician from MIT, the same one who stole the Prime > > Numbers algorithm, discovered by two Inverse 19 country boys. > > > Da plot thickens. > > Google (has to be Google): algebraic integers vs complex numbers > > A paper of mine should come up #1. (If it doesn't I want to hear > about it in reply and please give your country.) > > Seems the ring of algebraic integers has a fight with the field of > complex numbers and directly contradicts it. > > Of course, you should know who ultimately wins that battle. > > But that fight shatters the dreams of a generation of mathematicians > who it seems would rather be wrong--and live in a world where their > training is "right"--than handle the mathematical truth. > > James Harris #2 in Australia with Wiki first. I use Wiki a lot so it may have to do with my profile.
From: Pubkeybreaker on 13 Jun 2010 00:58 On Jun 12, 8:38 pm, "dannas" <inva...(a)invalid.com> wrote: > "JSH" <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >My degree in physics has to do with what humanity found WORKS. And > >we're surrounded by examples every day, including these computers and > >networks over which we furiously trade insults. > > Wrong, that was electrical and computer engineering, physics has little to > do with it. Vanderbilt will not confirm that a James H. Harris ever got a degree in physics.
From: Pubkeybreaker on 13 Jun 2010 01:08
On Jun 13, 12:58 am, Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Jun 12, 8:38 pm, "dannas" <inva...(a)invalid.com> wrote: > > > "JSH" <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >My degree in physics has to do with what humanity found WORKS. And > > >we're surrounded by examples every day, including these computers and > > >networks over which we furiously trade insults. > > > Wrong, that was electrical and computer engineering, physics has little to > > do with it. > > Vanderbilt will not confirm that a James H. Harris ever got a degree > in > physics. In fact, if you think about it: James math skills are so poor that there is no way he could get a degree in physics! James wouldn't know the difference between the curl and divergence of a vector field if it bit him. He certainly is so lacking in understanding of linear algebra that tensors are beyond him, and as for understanding the role of SO(3) and SU(3) forget it. |