JSH: When your math is wrong
in [Math]
|
Prev: Numeric Mc^2. By Aiya-Oba
Next: math solution, fyi
From: JSH on 13 Jun 2010 11:43 On Jun 13, 7:44 am, David Bernier <david...(a)videotron.ca> wrote: > JSH wrote: > > On Jun 13, 12:28 am, David Bernier<david...(a)videotron.ca> wrote: > >> MichaelW wrote: > >>> On Jun 13, 1:14 pm, JSH<jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Jun 12, 7:01 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com"<porky_pig...(a)my- > > >>>> deja.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Jun 11, 7:51 pm, JSH<jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> The real underlying problem is that years ago I found a foundational > >>>>>> error in number theory. > > >>>>> Yeah, sure. Let me guess. Prime Factorization Theorem, right? It's all > >>>>> wrong. Courtesy of JSH. And of course you're not going to tell anyone > >>>>> exactly what was that error for fear it would be stolen by some white > >>>>> blue-eyed mathematician from MIT, the same one who stole the Prime > >>>>> Numbers algorithm, discovered by two Inverse 19 country boys. > > >>>>> Da plot thickens. > > >>>> Google (has to be Google): algebraic integers vs complex numbers > > >>>> A paper of mine should come up #1. (If it doesn't I want to hear > >>>> about it in reply and please give your country.) > > >>>> Seems the ring of algebraic integers has a fight with the field of > >>>> complex numbers and directly contradicts it. > > >>>> Of course, you should know who ultimately wins that battle. > > >>>> But that fight shatters the dreams of a generation of mathematicians > >>>> who it seems would rather be wrong--and live in a world where their > >>>> training is "right"--than handle the mathematical truth. > > >>>> James Harris > > >>> #2 in Australia with Wiki first. I use Wiki a lot so it may have to do > >>> with my profile. > > >> I tried<http://www.google.fr/> on: > >> entiers algebriques versus les nombres complexes > > > I didn't write it in French!!! > > > Why would Google think that a French speaking person asking a question > > in French, wanted an English document? > > > How well would it go over in France if Google routinely gave you > > English when you made French queries? > > > And I really wanted to reply to this one! That's just so funny! > > > Do the English query and report back, please. I'm curious. I do get > > hits from France to my math blog, of course, as I cover all of Europe. > > > I can assure you that most queries to my blog are in English, though > > there are some other languages represented, for some things, like the > > definition of mathematical proof. > > > I guess that translates better across the globe. > > > James Harris > > I often use Google translate to read news stories in Spanish. > > David Bernier Which doesn't tell me if the query in English comes up in France. Query again in Google--in English: algebraic integers vs complex numbers People may wonder why I don't just got to mathematicians with my results! Well I have and they kind of go bye-bye. And that is so weird when you see a response that indicates that the human being you're dealing with has sort of lost it. My favorite thing though is when they leave the country on sabbatical! Isn't that way cool? I used to email papers to mathematicians almost at random, but finally felt sorry for them. That's a mean thing to do when you realize what will happen. Once I was consciously realizing these people's brains were snapping, I realized I couldn't in good conscience keep doing that to them. James Harris
From: El Negro on 13 Jun 2010 11:50 On Jun 11, 7:10 pm, Pollux <po....(a)gmail.com> wrote: > (6/11/10 4:51 PM), JSH wrote: > <snip> > > Maybe we could summarize the average sci.math post: > > 1. I'm right, you are all stupid, > 2. I have a new theory, all the other mathematicians have been wrong for > centuries (and stupid), > 3. I demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that 1 + 1 != 2, but if you > ask details, it's only that you are utterly stupid, > 4. I know that infinity doesn't exist, if you think otherwise, you are > stupid, > 5. Cantor was wrong all along, (and stupid) > 6. Einstein was completely wrong, (ah, here they usually don't dare to > say that Einstein was stupid?!) > 7. I have discovered all by myself a wonderful new identity: a + a = 3a, > (but I'm not stupid) > > and on and on > .... > > It's just getting very stale and boring, and I've been here only a week. Only I can say you are all stupid!
From: Tim Little on 15 Jun 2010 23:34 On 2010-06-13, JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Google (has to be Google): algebraic integers vs complex numbers > > A paper of mine should come up #1. (If it doesn't I want to hear > about it in reply and please give your country.) First result (Australia): Algebraic integer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The set of all algebraic integers is closed under addition and multiplication and therefore is a subring of complex numbers denoted by A. The ring A is the ... The 2nd result is yours. I am actually surprised, since the wikipedia article does not contain the exact search phrase either in body or title while yours does. The ordering of Google's results are usually quite sensitive to precise details of spelling, phrasing, word order, and proximity. > Seems the ring of algebraic integers has a fight with the field of > complex numbers Do you sell tickets to this amazing fight? Can I buy a commemorative pair of boxing gloves? > Of course, you should know who ultimately wins that battle. Like all fights, the sellers of tickets and merchandise obviously. - Tim
From: dannas on 16 Jun 2010 11:52 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:d5a023df-784b-494d-bc11-efc112c874d4(a)b15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... On Jun 13, 7:44 am, David Bernier <david...(a)videotron.ca> wrote: > JSH wrote: > > On Jun 13, 12:28 am, David Bernier<david...(a)videotron.ca> wrote: > >> MichaelW wrote: > >>> On Jun 13, 1:14 pm, JSH<jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Jun 12, 7:01 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com"<porky_pig...(a)my- > > >>>> deja.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Jun 11, 7:51 pm, JSH<jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> The real underlying problem is that years ago I found a > >>>>>> foundational > >>>>>> error in number theory. > > >>>>> Yeah, sure. Let me guess. Prime Factorization Theorem, right? It's > >>>>> all > >>>>> wrong. Courtesy of JSH. And of course you're not going to tell > >>>>> anyone > >>>>> exactly what was that error for fear it would be stolen by some > >>>>> white > >>>>> blue-eyed mathematician from MIT, the same one who stole the Prime > >>>>> Numbers algorithm, discovered by two Inverse 19 country boys. > > >>>>> Da plot thickens. > > >>>> Google (has to be Google): algebraic integers vs complex numbers > > >>>> A paper of mine should come up #1. (If it doesn't I want to hear > >>>> about it in reply and please give your country.) > > >>>> Seems the ring of algebraic integers has a fight with the field of > >>>> complex numbers and directly contradicts it. > > >>>> Of course, you should know who ultimately wins that battle. > > >>>> But that fight shatters the dreams of a generation of mathematicians > >>>> who it seems would rather be wrong--and live in a world where their > >>>> training is "right"--than handle the mathematical truth. > > >>>> James Harris > > >>> #2 in Australia with Wiki first. I use Wiki a lot so it may have to do > >>> with my profile. > > >> I tried<http://www.google.fr/> on: > >> entiers algebriques versus les nombres complexes > > > I didn't write it in French!!! > > > Why would Google think that a French speaking person asking a question > > in French, wanted an English document? > > > How well would it go over in France if Google routinely gave you > > English when you made French queries? > > > And I really wanted to reply to this one! That's just so funny! > > > Do the English query and report back, please. I'm curious. I do get > > hits from France to my math blog, of course, as I cover all of Europe. > > > I can assure you that most queries to my blog are in English, though > > there are some other languages represented, for some things, like the > > definition of mathematical proof. > > > I guess that translates better across the globe. > > > James Harris > > I often use Google translate to read news stories in Spanish. > > David Bernier >. Once I >was consciously realizing these people's brains were snapping, I >realized I couldn't in good conscience keep doing that to them. you were conscience once ? When did that happen? >James Harris
From: Generalzod on 13 Jun 2010 01:12
"JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:e67da582-b085-4902-9810-1be1d368d441(a)j36g2000prj.googlegroups.com... On Jun 12, 7:01 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my- deja.com> wrote: > On Jun 11, 7:51 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> > The real underlying problem is that years ago I found a foundational >> > error in number theory. > >> Yeah, sure. Let me guess. Prime Factorization Theorem, right? It's all >> wrong. Courtesy of JSH. And of course you're not going to tell anyone >> exactly what was that error for fear it would be stolen by some white >> blue-eyed mathematician from MIT, the same one who stole the Prime >> Numbers algorithm, discovered by two Inverse 19 country boys. >> >> Da plot thickens. >Google (has to be Google): algebraic integers vs complex numbers > >A paper of mine should come up #1. (If it doesn't I want to hear >about it in reply and please give your country.) nothing at all shows from you, Im in USA and use Google a lot. >Seems the ring of algebraic integers has a fight with the field of >complex numbers and directly contradicts it. Where did you copy "complex numbers" from ? Why is it a "field" ? How does it fight with your ring? > >Of course, you should know who ultimately wins that battle. > >But that fight shatters the dreams of a generation of mathematicians >who it seems would rather be wrong--and live in a world where their >training is "right"--than handle the mathematical truth. your schick is very old, dude. It smells like a pair of grandpa's old moldy shoes. and So does your math, its all vaporware, It stinks to high heaven JSH monkey-math-madness is meaningless and makes no money >James Harris |