JSH: Yeah fame is weird
in [Math]
|
From: Joshua Cranmer on 16 Jun 2010 17:34 On 06/15/2010 11:14 PM, JSH wrote: > Difference with Google search rankings is that people all over the > world can see it for themselves. Difference with other search rankings is that people can get a view that is freer from corporate self-interest. > Few others are in our league. Few others can compete with us three > when it comes to math topics. Not even universities. Other search engines disagree. On the terms you provided, only 1 of 4 non-Google search engines (I'm discounting Google since there is a strong possibility of corporate bias in search results) mentioned your blog on the first page, with the other results dominated by various institutions' pages. >> Considering that you so often caveat that the apparent results only show >> up on Google, its lack of appearance on other sites would lend its >> support to this thesis. What do you think about this possibility? > > Check Yahoo! Do the search on: mymath Because obviously doing a search on a domain portion in the site URL is going to be *so* unbiased. On the search terms you continually pound on about... nope, not on the first page. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
From: featherlite on 16 Jun 2010 21:18 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1960f0c2-860c-4ae1-8b7f-ecf1894f6886(a)y6g2000pra.googlegroups.com... On Jun 16, 5:00 am, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: > JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > Google search results are as easy as a person going to their browser > > and checking. > > > So I can give: mymath > > > The debate can then be seen in the context of a person's own > > experience. > > Yes, it is remarkable that if you google on a string of letters that is > not a proper English word at all, your blog comes up high! >Yeah, I think it's kind of weird. >The main point though was the *resistance* which included attacks on >Google. >James Harris I-Ierc is your superior.
From: Jim Ferry on 16 Jun 2010 22:29 On Jun 16, 8:04 am, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: > Tim Little <t...(a)little-possums.net> writes: > > On 2010-06-14, Jim Ferry <corkleb...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Oh this is extremely disappointing! I would love to see you in a > >> reality show. I will say "reality show" a few more times (reality > >> show reality show reality show) in the hopes of improving the search > >> score and thus connecting with a television producer to pitch this > >> idea: Unrecognized Genius. > > > Your posts is Google rank #1 for "unrecognized genius" "reality show" > > already! Well done, that's better rank than James' for algebraic > > integers vs complex numbers. > > Yes, but it ranks high because it's *about* James. People all over the > world care about JSH, so it's natural that Google adds weight to posts > in his threads that discuss JSH in entertainment ventures. No no no! What it *clearly* means is that there exists a reality show called Unrecognized Genius, which is just as I described. Google has the power to turn ideas into reality. Do you know how Perelman proved the Poincare conjecture? He googled "Perelman's proof of the Poincare conjecture" on the Wayforward Machine. > As usual, Jim is just riding on JSH's coattails. I sure am. In fact I googled "mymath" and what I found must be, unless you're calling Google a liar, both mine and math. (Ugh. My tears are so yummy and sweet.) > Come on, people, it's all so obvious!
From: rossum on 18 Jun 2010 05:26
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:29:06 -0700 (PDT), Jim Ferry <corklebath(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >No no no! What it *clearly* means is that there exists a reality show >called Unrecognized Genius, which is just as I described. Google has >the power to turn ideas into reality. Do you know how Perelman proved >the Poincare conjecture? He googled "Perelman's proof of the Poincare >conjecture" on the Wayforward Machine. How extremely stupid of me not to have thought of that. rossum |