Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Jan 2007 07:31 In article <eo6tdr$vsa$2(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <45A6D193.A694451(a)hotmail.com>, >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> You need to turn on your modem's sound. You'll hear all kinds of >>> mating sounds. You can also tell if the ISP you're calling has >>> a headache and will cause comm eruptions. >> >>I used to do that. >> >>With broadband it's not necessary. > >You also need much better hearing. Why? I've never met broadband. It's sound pattern differences that predict that some behaviour will change. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Jan 2007 07:33 In article <eo5pi8$bam$8(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >In article <eo5bun$8qk_001(a)s814.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>In article <45A5D901.C7F3FDDC(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>MassiveProng wrote: >>> >>>> We are at war. >>> >>>With which country ? >> >>It's a new kind of war. The stakes are civilizations, not >>political geographical lines. You are still stuck in European >>style thinking about rules of waging war. Since this is a new kind of >>war, new rules and new techniques are being created. So far, >>these new rules are being dictated to Western civilization by >>religious extremists. Since technology allows these groups to >>wreak havoc globally, there will have to be new ways to deal >>with problems and messes they create. Winning this war requires >>time. Nobody will be able to say, "We won" on a specific date >>until historians look back on the century. >> >The constitution provides one way, and one way only, to take this country to >war. Does the single way deal with a war between civilizations? hmm.. this is now getting interesting. > > >>The only response from the Democrat leadership last night was >>their presidential campaign platform. It was ineffective in >>2004; I don't understand why they think it will be effective >>in 2008. > >Like Bush's plan has been so effective for 4 years, right? I has been effective. You just aren't hearing about it because that news would undermine the Democrat leadership's goal of ceding. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Jan 2007 07:34 In article <45A6D1C3.633E8D5C(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >MassiveProng wrote: >> > >> >> We are at war. >> > >> >With which country ? >> >> It's a new kind of war. > >No it isn't. That's just a new excuse. > >What country is the USA at war with ? You are going to have to change your mindset to survive. This is not a war between countries but between civilizations. /BAH
From: T Wake on 12 Jan 2007 07:42 "MassiveProng" <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:hfieq25psggps4m8co98c3vvf5vks6mco6(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:30:54 +0000, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >> >>You mean Iran ? Simply not proven. > > > You see... there you go... and you had almost made it completely > out of the retard barrel. > > I guess it's in your genes. You'll wash up on shore... Whale on the > beach. By the way, what was wrong with "joe bloe" as a "name" for posting? Did you end up in too many kill files?
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Jan 2007 07:54
In article <45A74B55.B204D4DE(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >MassiveProng wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> > >> >You mean Iran ? Simply not proven. >> >> You see... there you go... and you had almost made it completely >> out of the retard barrel. >> >> I guess it's in your genes. You'll wash up on shore... Whale on the >> beach. > >You have some *PROOF* ? I do mean proof not conjecture. With regard to >conjecture I'd agree it's very likely they don't have an interest but they're >*way* off being able to do anything. So you are willing to wait until Iran bombs somebody before you will believe that 1. they have the bombs and 2. they will use them. I suggest you write them a letter and volunteer to be their first target. I personally prefer mess prevention rather than cleaning it up. /BAH |