Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 25 Feb 2007 14:44 On Sun, 25 Feb 07 12:32:54 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >This is one way to do a full restore. Note that it may also restore >the cause of the problem. You're an idiot. You likely could not even list five of the most common causes that require the need for a restore. Nor, it appears, that you cannot grasp the fact that the backup was done before such a need arose.
From: MassiveProng on 25 Feb 2007 14:44 On Sun, 25 Feb 07 12:32:54 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >AFAIK, only our system had enough dates stored in each file's >RIB (retrieval information block) that could do this. Bwuahahahahahahahahahaah! You are decades behind.
From: MassiveProng on 25 Feb 2007 14:48 On Sun, 25 Feb 07 13:44:15 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >>I am talking of a complete and total and correct image of the drive. > >I know you are. A complete and total and correct image of the >drive will also include its bad spots. You're an idiot.
From: MassiveProng on 25 Feb 2007 14:51 On Sun, 25 Feb 07 13:51:24 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >Oh, good grief. You have a serious design flaw here if you are >overwriting you backup copies. They are sequenced, dipshit. One week's backups go on a set of drives. The following week goes onto another set of drives. The week following that (week 3 ) goes on week one's drives. You could be a bit more clueless, just not in this life.
From: MassiveProng on 25 Feb 2007 14:57
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:14:40 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us: >In article <ers2eb$8qk_004(a)s1016.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>In article <erppm2$c02$5(a)blue.rahul.net>, >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>In article <erpb68$8qk_001(a)s934.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >><snip> >> >>>>>> Computer usage >>>>>>by the general population requires more than this. You keep >>>>>>looking at the load balance from a naive user POV. >>>>> >>>>>No, you are just making stuff up because you've been shown to be wrong >>>>>about the real world of computers today. >>>> >>>>Keep thinking like that and you'll never learn something. >>> >>>From you! You have been shown to be wrong on this subject. >> >>You think I'm wrong only becaues you don't have my knowledge. >>Do you also think that people, who are experts in fields not >>your own, are also wrong? > >It appears that what you call knowledge is in fact a bunch of >misconceptions about hardware issues. You have made several statements >that are simply false on the subject. You may know things about the >coding of some old OSes but you are out of your depth when you try to talk >about hardware. > I agree 100% |