From: MassiveProng on 26 Feb 2007 19:31 On Mon, 26 Feb 07 12:10:08 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >Swap out from where? If the CPU architecture has write-through >cache you don't have to move the contents of the page you need >to remove in order to fetch the page that Task A needs from >memory. You do if said memory is virtual.
From: MassiveProng on 26 Feb 2007 19:37 On Mon, 26 Feb 07 12:36:17 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> >The wrinkle to the new process is that the checks have stopped >traveling. Bullshit. My landlord gets a check, and his bank submits it to my bank who has it ON FILE RIGHT NOW, I get an image of the check in my mailed monthly statement, and can look up a full size image of all my checks online. You are CLUELESS.
From: MassiveProng on 26 Feb 2007 19:38 On Mon, 26 Feb 07 12:36:17 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > Instead you are trusting the payee to destroy the >piece of paper you sent to him; You're an idiot. Checks still move between banks, dipshit.
From: MassiveProng on 26 Feb 2007 19:39 On Mon, 26 Feb 07 12:36:17 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > These centers are what the Federal >Reserve Board is trying to remove from the process. You're an idiot.
From: MassiveProng on 26 Feb 2007 19:40
On Mon, 26 Feb 07 12:42:30 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >My point is that the check NEVER gets back to the bank. You're an idiot. > This >is a new procedure. In your little fantasy world. |