Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: joseph2k on 9 Oct 2006 23:39 T Wake wrote: > > "joseph2k" <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:CYXVg.3026$NE6.2914(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... >> Michael A. Terrell wrote: >> >>> T Wake wrote: >>>> >>>> This is a logical fallacy. Everything you have said can be true and >>>> still >>>> it would not disprove anything YD has written. >>>> >>>> Insulting someone does not change the validity of their comments, nor >>>> does eliciting sympathy for yourself. >>> >>> >>> If I needed sympathy, I wouldn't visit the vast troll playground >>> known as Usenet. ;-) >>> >>> >> Top drawer reply Mr. Terrell. > > > To paraphrase your comments to me, if you want to indulge in a group hug > take it to Email. What a coward, attempting to misdirect replies to a bit bucket (alt.local.village.idiot). Turnabout is fair play. JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens. --Schiller
From: Eeyore on 9 Oct 2006 23:40 JoeBloe wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 03:47:42 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Have you any idea how any dickheads' accounts ( who chose to make an issue of > >dickheadedness behaviour ) I've had cancelled ? > > You're a legend in your own mind, asswipe. Do *you* have a newsgroup named after you ? Graham
From: John Larkin on 9 Oct 2006 23:52 On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:50:52 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >John Larkin wrote: >> >> I studied the Jefferson-Hamilton debate in school, as most of us have, >> and I'm not ignorant of it. Amendment 4, >> >> "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, >> papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall >> not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, >> supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the >> place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." >> >> doesn't address whether the people have a right to privacy when >> engaged in public affairs, or when using a NASA-launched satellite to >> send messages to another country. Censorship of international >> correspondence in time of war would not have shocked the Founders. >> >> Your insertion of phrases like "of which you appear ignorant" is >> silly. And I don't care what you consider to be "excusable" because >> you have no means of enforcing your rules. So you might stick to >> trying to make sense. > > > Soldiers letters home were censored during WW II, I have seen >pictures of letters with words or sentences cut out. I have a DVD with >some WW II training films, including one about "Loose Lips Sink Ships", >telling the military what they could, and could not write home about in >any war related effort. There's always a compromise between liberty and safety. That's why we have traffic lights. John
From: joseph2k on 10 Oct 2006 00:03 Michael A. Terrell wrote: > joseph2k wrote: >> >> And yes, they use that paper check to track you also. If you ever go to >> a >> VA hospital they set up even more accounts to track you. Are you getting >> the picture yet? > > > No, just your usual static. Spill the beans for everyone to see the > deep dark government secrets. > > What "Accounts"? I am 100% disabled, living on a VA disability > pension so what "Accounts" are you talking about? More accounts if I'm > in the hospital? I am on zero co-pay because of my disability, so there > is nothing to charge for while in the hospital, although, I won't be > paid my disability pension while in the VA hospital. > > Do you think the government knows less about you, than me? > > I've worked in broadcast engineering and defense electronics most of > my life, so they have always kept track of me, from the time I was first > drafted. If you think you have any real secrets from them, you are more > deluded than I thought. > > Thank you for making my point for me. And yes, i am well aware that i will be forever monitored because of my military service time. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens. --Schiller
From: Michael A. Terrell on 10 Oct 2006 00:41
joseph2k wrote: > > T Wake wrote: > > > > > "joseph2k" <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:CYXVg.3026$NE6.2914(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... > >> Michael A. Terrell wrote: > >> > >>> T Wake wrote: > >>>> > >>>> This is a logical fallacy. Everything you have said can be true and > >>>> still > >>>> it would not disprove anything YD has written. > >>>> > >>>> Insulting someone does not change the validity of their comments, nor > >>>> does eliciting sympathy for yourself. > >>> > >>> > >>> If I needed sympathy, I wouldn't visit the vast troll playground > >>> known as Usenet. ;-) > >>> > >>> > >> Top drawer reply Mr. Terrell. > > > > > > To paraphrase your comments to me, if you want to indulge in a group hug > > take it to Email. > > What a coward, attempting to misdirect replies to a bit bucket > (alt.local.village.idiot). Turnabout is fair play. It will be like "old home week" for T Wake at alt.local.village.idiot when he spends time with all his relatives. ;-) -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |