From: Daniel Mandic on 20 Oct 2006 10:03 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <453642C1.5D38F093(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> As for Europe, I'm not hearing much discussions about this > >> either. What I do hear is capitulations so that they > >> get their oil deliveries. > > > > Utter drivel. > > If your posts are an example of conclusions made from the news > you get, I'm even more worried about Eurpoe ceding completely > with one little oil tap turned off. > /BAH Nar. Norge and Danmark do have so much own Oil, they cannot consume alone. Also British Petrol and other European oil-societies (yes, it's also me ;-)), OMV (austrian do it with 'Know How' bez of no oil-territories) for example, are oil-producing. (remembering the last oil-bottleneck, in ~2000, when USA oil-tanker pumped/bought oil at Rotterdam-Holland seaport -EU). UK had the greatest struggle at that time. Truck driver have been on strike, too. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: Eeyore on 20 Oct 2006 11:59 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Yes. The history we (US kids) learned in elementary school seems > to have been a lot of myth. What a waste of learning time. Now stop to think what else might be based on popular myths ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Oct 2006 12:01 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >>>> |||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk wrote: > > >>>>>I doubt if you would find any of the reactive starting materials for CW > >>>>>like phosphorous chloride, fluoride, oxychloride, thionyl chloride or > >>>>>any of the other more complex intermediates like trimethyl phosphite > >>>>>(some of which have legitimate use in plastics and insecticides) on any > >>>>>drug store shelf. > >>>> > >>>> I have my chemistry book, also known as the recipe book. Now specify > >>>> the ingredients needed to make those dishes you've just listed. > >>> > >>> > >>>They were ingredients. > >> > >> Which need to be made. These compounds do not occur naturally > >> in the soil. > > > > > >Not relevant, they are ingredient for the creation of CW. Breaking it down > >into the common elements is truly pointless and nothing but a distraction. > > This point is not irrelavent. I am trying to get you to think with > more than ball-influenced brains. A chemistry major would know > how to make those ingredients and then make the weapons. The precursors may not quite so simple to make as you imagine. Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Oct 2006 12:02 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Millions are afraid to speak because they > will be immediately killed for heresy. And you expect to be taken seriously ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 20 Oct 2006 12:03
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: > > >But liberals believe in liberty (that's what the word "liberal" comes from) > >and you take away liberty if you insist on fundamentalism. > > Which liberals are you talking about? The ones who call themselves > Liberals in today's politics put absolute equality, eliminating > liberty, as their number one goal. You mean *US* poltics at worst perhaps. Besides the Republicans are doing a fine job of eliminating liberty without anyone else's help ! Graham |