Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 23 Oct 2006 06:26 In article <453A25A3.5B3C1495(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >The precursors may not quite so simple to make as you imagine. >> >> Goodfucking GRIEF! I didn't say it was simple. > >You implied that any country could make these complex precursors. Any person who learns how to do chemistry can. > > >> No chemistry is simple. Have you ever taken a chemistry course? > >Yes. I have an 'A level' in Chemistry - that's after the 'O level' of course. I >can even recite the periodic table from memory. Since you think that memorization rather than cooking defines knowing chemistry, I'll assume that you cannot understand what I'm talking about. > >You ? I was getting a biology major. Chemistry minor was a requirement for that. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 23 Oct 2006 06:28 In article <0ru_g.14854$GR.11260(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:453A25A3.5B3C1495(a)hotmail.com... >> >> >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >The precursors may not quite so simple to make as you imagine. >>> >>> Goodfucking GRIEF! I didn't say it was simple. >> >> You implied that any country could make these complex precursors. >> >> >>> No chemistry is simple. Have you ever taken a chemistry course? >> >> Yes. I have an 'A level' in Chemistry - that's after the 'O level' of >> course. I >> can even recite the periodic table from memory. > >I'll raise you a PhD and 15 years of industrial experience. To you, BAH. With all that chemistry experience, you are telling me that you could not make one of the ingredients for a chemical weapon? /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 23 Oct 2006 06:29 In article <453A2600.2D21DA2(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> I know I do not write clear enough for all values of IQs. > >Mine's 152. > >What's yours ? I don't know. It was too high so it was decided to never tell me and fix the problem of being too smart. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 23 Oct 2006 07:05 In article <453A2699.E10D871A(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> A lot of recent killing is the hangover of the Cold War. > >Uh ????? > >Can you elaborate on that ? Weren't you the one who claimed to have learned a lot history in this thread? A goal of Russia was to control the Suez Canal and oil shipping. So it would pick a country, advise it, furnish weaponry. The free world countries such as the UK, US, and France would pick a country next door and do the same thing. Focus points were the Arabian Gulf, southeast Asia, north Pacific, Suez Canal, Cuba, various central and South American countries, and lots of places in the African continent. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 23 Oct 2006 07:14
In article <2cb0a$453a24a0$49ecfae$3598(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> In article <58GdnewlesO5CKvYRVnygA(a)pipex.net>, >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:eh536o$8qk_004(a)s847.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> >>>>In article <uqkaj29qqainbc7l4mc8i51e40dbj8cf56(a)4ax.com>, >>>> John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:57:10 +0100, Eeyore >>>>><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>John Larkin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Tue, 17 Oct 06 11:50:44 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Pushing in certain areas is not the best way to prevent future >>>>>>>>messes. I've found that the only way for people to learn how >>>>>>>>not make new messes is to have them clean up the ones they >>>>>>>>already made. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Excellent. Care to assign cleanup duties in the Middle East and >>>>>>>Africa? >>>>>> >>>>>>Which bits of Africa did you have in mind ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Well, let's see. We could start with the Belgian Congo, and maybe >>>>>Rhodesia, perhaps Cote D'Ivorie and German East Africa. >>>> >>>>I think Liberia is key but I'm not sure. It would be productive >>>>if the countries in Africa were left alone. >0>> >>>To kill each other? Strikes me as a reasonable idea. Let them all kill each >>>other, then when the dust settles we can kill the one or two survivors and >>>take all the diamonds. >> >> >> A lot of recent killing is the hangover of the Cold War. > >Not true, IMO. African hatreds are much like American >ones, passed from one generation to the next without >understanding, as in "Damn Yankees burned the south!" Those hatreds were used by the Communists and by the free world. > >Tribal hatreds go back many generations and thrive >partly because of their verbal traditions. > >> The UN >> has not helped since it seems to be admirable to keep the >> former third world in its place by making them welfare countries >> and punishing those who refuse such handouts. > >Please consider the fact that the third world had >exactly the same opportunities as the first world >over a period of several millenia. They aren't >welfare countries because of us and the UN, they >remain welfare countries despite us and the UN. >This all comes back to mindsets and cultural values. I disagree. A hidden agenda, perhaps unconscious, of the UN leaders were to keep the rest of the world in their place. A political leader who refused "help" from the UN (thus placing the country in a long-term debt it could never repay) was punished by ignoring reasonalbe requests. It's a human behaviour thing. > >You'll find that within those countries are some >extremely wealthy families. The local population >has a sense that those rich folks are crooked >and taking advantage of the poor. The simple >fact is that in every population of national >size you'll have a few individuals who are >truly entrepreneurs. Sometimes the government >and/or the people manage to pull them down and >redistribute their wealth. A lot of times, it is the UN generosity that does this. > >For examples of all of the above, visit Appalachia. Didn't marketing move into Appalachia and start cottage industries in crafts? > >For a minature slightly more entertaining version, >watch the movie _Zorba the Greek_. I'll try. Out of curiosity, what do you consider rich? A GNP measure or balance of a checking account or something else? /BAH |