From: Polly the Parrot on 2 Dec 2009 15:07 On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:52:19 +1100, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote: >terryc wrote >> Fred wrote > >>> Compensation means the proposal is really a money-go-round with associated bureaucracy, > >>> Only a small percentage of high wealth individuals would be left holding the can. > >> Can you explain how I get the compensation? > >You'll have to be a pov/pensioner etc to get anything. > >> I'm already getting the increased bills > >Not due to the ETS. Those bills are due to the fucked labor >party using the electricity industry as a source of revenue. > Remember the unions campaigning against privatisation? They claimed then keeping in public ownership was the only way to keep prices down.
From: terryc on 2 Dec 2009 21:15 On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:52:19 +1100, Rod Speed wrote: > Not due to the ETS. Those bills are due to the fucked labor party using > the electricity industry as a source of revenue. Who actually started taking the acculmulated reserves away from statuatory authorities in NSW?. Hasn't both parties dipped their porkies in the pool?
From: Rod Speed on 2 Dec 2009 21:28 terryc wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> terryc wrote >>> I'm already getting the increased bills >> Not due to the ETS. Those bills are due to the fucked labor >> party using the electricity industry as a source of revenue. > Who actually started taking the acculmulated reserves > away from statuatory authorities in NSW?. It wasnt due to taking accumulated reserves away, it was gouging them for immense amounts of their cashflow every single year that did it with both electricity and water as well. > Hasn't both parties dipped their porkies in the pool? Nope.
From: keithr on 3 Dec 2009 02:02 On 3/12/2009 4:44 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > keithr wrote >> atec 7 7 wrote >>> keithr wrote >>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF> wrote > >>>>> No doubt about it. KRudd is a bloody fool! > >>>> Better he than the Mad Monk > >>> You have a choice which is pretty much pre made >>> krud plus the tax on everything >>> someone else >>> choose one wit no bullshite > >> Do you want to put that into english? >> >> Anyway they'll dump the Monk when the libs get decimated next time around > > Taint gunna happen, the voters aint that stupid, even if you are. Don't bet on it, the monk wants to bring back work choices.
From: keithr on 3 Dec 2009 02:04
On 3/12/2009 12:35 AM, atec 7 7 wrote: > keithr wrote: >> atec 7 7 wrote: >>> keithr wrote: >>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF > wrote: >>>> >>>>> No doubt about it. KRudd is a bloody fool! >>>> >>>> Better he than the Mad Monk >>> You have a choice which is pretty much pre made >>> krud plus the tax on everything >>> someone else >>> choose one wit no bullshite >> >> Do you want to put that into english? > > > no > but if you try and squint a little it makes sense > >> >> Anyway they'll dump the Monk when the libs get decimated next time >> around - if he lasts that long. > he will be around a while > or until Turnbull takes it back He will probably be there for a bit, I don't think anybody else wants the job other than Malcom baby, and he is burnt enough to want to lick his wounds for a bit. |