KRuddy's Education Revolution
in [Computers]
|
From: terryc on 5 Dec 2009 00:47 On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:52:38 +1100, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> Learn to do a bit of spooking around yourself instead of reading >>>> opinion pieces in the daily terror. > >>> Never ever read it, fuckwit. > >> So you actually looked at the tender specs for these project then? > > Dont need to, just look at the donation record, fuckwit. Lol, a work of fiction.
From: Rod Speed on 5 Dec 2009 01:04 terryc wrote: > On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:52:38 +1100, Rod Speed wrote: > > >>>>> Learn to do a bit of spooking around yourself instead of reading >>>>> opinion pieces in the daily terror. >> >>>> Never ever read it, fuckwit. >> >>> So you actually looked at the tender specs for these project then? >> >> Dont need to, just look at the donation record, fuckwit. > > Lol, a work of fiction. Corse you personally know the real story, eh fuckwit ?
From: Fred on 6 Dec 2009 01:42 terryc wrote: > On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:58:41 +1030, Fred wrote: > > >> Compensation means the proposal is really a money-go-round with >> associated bureaucracy, >> Only a small percentage of high wealth individuals would be left >> holding the can. > > Can you explain how I get the compensation? I'm already getting the > increased bills If a ETS gest up compensation would be provided through the tax system, presumably as a tax rebate applied each year.
From: Fred on 6 Dec 2009 01:43 Polly the Parrot wrote: > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 23:58:41 +1030, "Fred" <bluser(a)gaymail.com> wrote: > >> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " <""wassim.noujwas\"@yahoo.com is a >> tool . wrote: >>> atec 7 7 wrote: >>>> keithr wrote: >>>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No doubt about it. KRudd is a bloody fool! >>>>> >>>>> Better he than the Mad Monk >>>> You have a choice which is pretty much pre made >>>> krud plus the tax on everything >>>> someone else >>>> choose one wit no bullshite >>> >>> Obviously the fool wants to pay more tax. >> >> Fact is not many people don't understand what an ETS is. Simple >> minded folk might believe it's a tax on everything and vote >> accordingly. >> Compensation means the proposal is really a money-go-round with >> associated bureaucracy, >> Only a small percentage of high wealth individuals would be left >> holding the can. > > And why is this fair? An ETS is supposed to encourage high carbon users to reduce their consumption.
From: Sunny on 6 Dec 2009 02:21
"Fred" <bluser(a)gaymail.com> wrote in message news:7o1246F3ku5vuU1(a)mid.individual.net... > Polly the Parrot wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 23:58:41 +1030, "Fred" <bluser(a)gaymail.com> wrote: >> >>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " <""wassim.noujwas\"@yahoo.com is a >>> tool . wrote: >>>> atec 7 7 wrote: >>>>> keithr wrote: >>>>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> No doubt about it. KRudd is a bloody fool! >>>>>> >>>>>> Better he than the Mad Monk >>>>> You have a choice which is pretty much pre made >>>>> krud plus the tax on everything >>>>> someone else >>>>> choose one wit no bullshite >>>> >>>> Obviously the fool wants to pay more tax. >>> >>> Fact is not many people don't understand what an ETS is. Simple >>> minded folk might believe it's a tax on everything and vote >>> accordingly. >>> Compensation means the proposal is really a money-go-round with >>> associated bureaucracy, >>> Only a small percentage of high wealth individuals would be left >>> holding the can. >> >> And why is this fair? > > An ETS is supposed to encourage high carbon users to reduce their > consumption. Or, for them to buy "credits" and pass the costs onto customers. I am slowly getting pissed off with the water melons who are trying to make me feel guilty for <gasp> actually using electricity. |