Prev: Assumption of length contraction in original theory
Next: Bible foretells LHC's Black Hole
From: eon on 6 Jun 2010 04:37
On Jun 4, 7:53 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> LHC did not anticipate the over creation of new particles, I did, as
> written in the past posts.
>
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/figures/aberr/Aframe0009.gif
>
> And likewise I post the following:
>
> Proton's traveling at 99.99% of light contract into a space so tiny,
> near singularity) due to relativistic aberration observation, that
> Europe's LHC will not see into this tiny space, the Black Hole from
> the new particles colliding.
>
> No death could be sweeter, within the "blink" of an eye, LHC's Black
> Hole will cause the End of Earth.

the Collider is just another place to drink wine
fermented by the method of Champagne

for sure they will detect fart particles, farticles,
presumingly of wide interest that will revolutionize
known physics
From: nuny on 7 Jun 2010 00:12
On Jun 4, 8:58 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 8:53 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 6/4/10 12:53 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > LHC did not anticipate the over creation of new particles, I did...
>
> >    What new particles did you predict?
>
> What over creation of new particles did LHC not anticipate and the
> reason LHC is shutting and upgrading the collider?

Sounds like a conspiracy fantasy to me, but not responsive.

What new particles did you predict?


Mark L. Fergerson
From: Inertial on 7 Jun 2010 11:55
<guskz(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5e4c4b6c-b72c-4cb4-9b1a-4d6c3b8965da(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 7, 12:36 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>> "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:3b26e026-3076-44d5-af18-941ee56f76c3(a)42g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Jun 4, 8:58 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Jun 4, 8:53 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > On 6/4/10 12:53 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> > > LHC did not anticipate the over creation of new particles, I
>> >> > > did...
>>
>> >> > What new particles did you predict?
>>
>> >> What over creation of new particles did LHC not anticipate and the
>> >> reason LHC is shutting and upgrading the collider?
>>
>> > Sounds like a conspiracy fantasy to me, but not responsive.
>>
>> > What new particles did you predict?
>>
>> Hmm .. so is finding new particles a failure of the LHC?
>>
>> As I understand they did report a larger quantity of already known and
>> expected particles than was anticipated.
>>
> Correct, Alas "one" with knowledge, all others complained without
> knowing the important events at the LHC.
>
> New, not in terms of new kind:
>
> ... but new in terms of more particles AND most importantly in terms
> as being created where as before they didn't exist.

That's not unexpected .. only the quantity of them was.

> Now you have to see them to recognize their creation

They are detected .. that does not mean they need to be directly seen

> can anyone or
> their insufficiently tiny detectors see into a near-speed-of-light
> contracted near-singularity.

That's what is done .. that's how they found that there wer more particles
than expected. Gees.

> NO,impossible. To them (LHC) it **********remain*********** to be
> observed as energy, waves overlap and do not collide, where as instead
> it will be newly created particles COLLIDING = BLACK HOLE.
>
> REVELATION: (Not my words) And Earth will depart as a scroll when it
> is rolled-up.
> Roll-up a paper, now look through it's hole/tube.

You're clearly insane.

From: Raymond Yohros on 11 Jun 2010 13:33
On Jun 4, 7:53 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/4/10 12:53 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > LHC did not anticipate the over creation of new particles, I did...
>
>    What new particles did you predict?
>

what i will like to know beside that is what new
wavelenghts can come into the picture (specially
in the lower end?) can they go lower than the microwave range?
is it hard to detect wavelenghts that can
have very low amplitudes?
i imagine the peek resonances being above
vissible light? is there a place where one
can see this data?

regards
r.y
From: guskz on 11 Jun 2010 22:14
On Jun 11, 1:33 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 7:53 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 6/4/10 12:53 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > LHC did not anticipate the over creation of new particles, I did...
>
> >    What new particles did you predict?
>
> what i will like to know beside that is what new
> wavelenghts can come into the picture (specially
> in the lower end?) can they go lower than the microwave range?
> is it hard to detect wavelenghts that can
> have very low amplitudes?
> i imagine the peek resonances being above
> vissible light? is there a place where one
> can see this data?
>
> regards
> r.y

They still can't perfectly understand light's interference through
slits, likewise polarization, (not to mention their absurd quantum
ripple leap) yet they "guarantee" zero interference in their
collisions, lest energy becomes duality & forms substantial particles
therefore a black hole.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Assumption of length contraction in original theory
Next: Bible foretells LHC's Black Hole