From: BURT on 11 Jun 2010 22:22 On Jun 11, 7:14 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 11, 1:33 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 4, 7:53 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 6/4/10 12:53 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > > > > LHC did not anticipate the over creation of new particles, I did... > > > > What new particles did you predict? > > > what i will like to know beside that is what new > > wavelenghts can come into the picture (specially > > in the lower end?) can they go lower than the microwave range? > > is it hard to detect wavelenghts that can > > have very low amplitudes? > > i imagine the peek resonances being above > > vissible light? is there a place where one > > can see this data? > > > regards > > r.y > > They still can't perfectly understand light's interference through > slits, likewise polarization, (not to mention their absurd quantum > ripple leap) yet they "guarantee" zero interference in their > collisions, lest energy becomes duality & forms substantial particles > therefore a black hole.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - We cannot test for the extreme of gravity to be measure by particle acceleration. If acceleration and gravity are equivalent as Einstein said the the strength of gravity can be defined as an acceleration and that has a below light speed limit. This is always true due to masses weight resistance. There is no change at or above light speed. This is the limit in space time. Mitch Raemsch
From: guskz on 12 Jun 2010 09:27 On Jun 7, 11:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:5e4c4b6c-b72c-4cb4-9b1a-4d6c3b8965da(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Jun 7, 12:36 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:3b26e026-3076-44d5-af18-941ee56f76c3(a)42g2000prb.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > On Jun 4, 8:58 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jun 4, 8:53 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > On 6/4/10 12:53 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > >> >> > > LHC did not anticipate the over creation of new particles, I > >> >> > > did... > > >> >> > What new particles did you predict? > > >> >> What over creation of new particles did LHC not anticipate and the > >> >> reason LHC is shutting and upgrading the collider? > > >> > Sounds like a conspiracy fantasy to me, but not responsive. > > >> > What new particles did you predict? > > >> Hmm .. so is finding new particles a failure of the LHC? > > >> As I understand they did report a larger quantity of already known and > >> expected particles than was anticipated. > > > Correct, Alas "one" with knowledge, all others complained without > > knowing the important events at the LHC. > > > New, not in terms of new kind: > > > ... but new in terms of more particles AND most importantly in terms > > as being created where as before they didn't exist. > > That's not unexpected .. only the quantity of them was. > > > Now you have to see them to recognize their creation > > They are detected .. that does not mean they need to be directly seen > > > can anyone or > > their insufficiently tiny detectors see into a near-speed-of-light > > contracted near-singularity. > > That's what is done .. that's how they found that there wer more particles > than expected. Gees. > Comparison using Cars being particles. They ***angled it****(the collisions) so when the cars crash, the flying parts (the resultant) go towards the detectors. The cars that don't crash travel straight on. The more you bombard the region with colliding cars, the more chance of multi-car collision pile-up on the highway. Meaning some of the flying parts, will not travel towards to detectors, same as Newton's cradle, some will go in the exact opposite direction, others in Newton's multi-car pile-up craddle (in the middle) will stay put. The "cradle" will get bigger and bigger in all directions (length, height, width) and simultaneously more and more compressed till it forms a rupture instead of a dent in space_time known as a black hole. The car parts going in the opposite directions will go from escape at first, but then as more cars (and more lanes) are on the highway. They will gradually also form another cradle in the opposite direction, these cradles will completely encircle the the main center of collision/compression and what I call the non-escape horizon. > > NO,impossible. To them (LHC) it **********remain*********** to be > > observed as energy, waves overlap and do not collide, where as instead > > it will be newly created particles COLLIDING = BLACK HOLE. > > > REVELATION: (Not my words) And Earth will depart as a scroll when it > > is rolled-up. > > Roll-up a paper, now look through it's hole/tube. > > You're clearly insane.
From: Inertial on 12 Jun 2010 11:41 <guskz(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:0cdc3f9f-845d-4388-a44e-a5ce247405a5(a)x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 7, 11:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:5e4c4b6c-b72c-4cb4-9b1a-4d6c3b8965da(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > On Jun 7, 12:36 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:3b26e026-3076-44d5-af18-941ee56f76c3(a)42g2000prb.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > On Jun 4, 8:58 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 4, 8:53 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On 6/4/10 12:53 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> > > LHC did not anticipate the over creation of new particles, I >> >> >> > > did... >> >> >> >> > What new particles did you predict? >> >> >> >> What over creation of new particles did LHC not anticipate and the >> >> >> reason LHC is shutting and upgrading the collider? >> >> >> > Sounds like a conspiracy fantasy to me, but not responsive. >> >> >> > What new particles did you predict? >> >> >> Hmm .. so is finding new particles a failure of the LHC? >> >> >> As I understand they did report a larger quantity of already known and >> >> expected particles than was anticipated. >> >> > Correct, Alas "one" with knowledge, all others complained without >> > knowing the important events at the LHC. >> >> > New, not in terms of new kind: >> >> > ... but new in terms of more particles AND most importantly in terms >> > as being created where as before they didn't exist. >> >> That's not unexpected .. only the quantity of them was. >> >> > Now you have to see them to recognize their creation >> >> They are detected .. that does not mean they need to be directly seen >> >> > can anyone or >> > their insufficiently tiny detectors see into a near-speed-of-light >> > contracted near-singularity. >> >> That's what is done .. that's how they found that there wer more >> particles >> than expected. Gees. >> > Comparison using Cars being particles. > > They ***angled it****(the collisions) so when the cars crash, the > flying parts (the resultant) go towards the detectors. The cars that > don't crash travel straight on. Irrelevant to the analogy > The more you bombard the region with colliding cars, the more chance > of multi-car collision pile-up on the highway. Irrelevant to the analogy > Meaning some of the flying parts, will not travel towards to > detectors, same as Newton's cradle, some will go in the exact opposite > direction, others in Newton's multi-car pile-up craddle (in the > middle) will stay put. Irrelevant to the analogy > The "cradle" will get bigger and bigger in all directions (length, > height, width) and simultaneously more and more compressed till it > forms a rupture instead of a dent in space_time known as a black > hole. Irrelevant to the analogy > The car parts going in the opposite directions will go from escape at > first, but then as more cars (and more lanes) are on the highway. They > will gradually also form another cradle in the opposite direction, > these cradles will completely encircle the the main center of > collision/compression and what I call the non-escape horizon. Irrelevant to the analogy Looks like you are being irrelevant.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Assumption of length contraction in original theory Next: Bible foretells LHC's Black Hole |