LS9/16 - not the desk for me
in [Live Sound]
|
From: Eeyore on 29 Nov 2008 12:23 George's Pro Sound Company wrote: > Mr. Liquidator > may I suggest you killfile eyesore > he does not post anything of substance anyway plus his view of the world > revolves around one shitty little club that plays clone acts > one step away from karoke > hardly a live sound pros job That's FAR from all I do. Graham
From: Eeyore on 29 Nov 2008 12:24 liquidator wrote: > The discussion was about a 240 mixer being a bad idea for the US market. It > is, and Graham keeps on about we should change our electrical system to suit > him. It would be sensible for the USA ! Graham
From: liquidator on 29 Nov 2008 12:28 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:493176E6.2AE08D97(a)hotmail.com... > Is it your case that no mixing desk should be manufactured requiring > 1.8kW ? Being pigheaded Graham. Jumping from a small mixer to "every mixer'...just to make a point you already lost. I will gladly run 240 WHEN NEEDED. When not needed I won't. And I won't buy some dinky comapny's oddball product. neither did many others- that's why they were in such duress.
From: Eeyore on 29 Nov 2008 12:41 liquidator wrote: > Graham is an amateur, and loses sight of that. What an absurd statement. I have been involved in pro audio, lighting, film and video my entire working life. > Graham loses sight of all this and tries to advocate "one size fits all". It's called the world market and the USA is losing it. Graham
From: Eeyore on 29 Nov 2008 12:41
liquidator wrote: > Point is we run 240 when we need to. So, standardise on it ! Graham |