From: Just Me on
On Apr 19, 3:17 pm, "Cwatters"
<colin.wattersNOS...(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote:
> "Just Me" <jpd...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:e91415d5-b111-478e-875d-cd9b6d16541a(a)y14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 19, 12:47 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Total power use at the LHC, cryonics and magnets and lights in
> >> the cafeteria, all in, is less than 2E8 Watts. And a significant part
> >> of that is expended as heat in pumps and such. Only a tiny
> >> fraction of that is released as electromagnetic energy. And,
> >> as already indicated, only a tiny fraction of that will get more
> >> than a few meters into the Earth, the fraction dropping rapidly
> >> with increasing depth.
>
> >> The core of the Earth isn't being heated by the LHC.
> >> Socks
>
> >What makes you think I'm talking about "heat"? I said nothing about
> >heat.
> >--
> >JM
>
> His point wasn't about heat either.

Please. While all the people of Europe are breathing glass dust and
ash, and the pagodas of China are busy doing the boogaloo, this is no
time to be cute. If he isn't talking about heat, then what is
this . . .

> >> The core of the Earth isn't being heated by the LHC.

Are you saying the degree to which anything becomes magnetized, or is
made subject to radiation (like the iron core of earth), that this
will be indicated by a temperature increase--or what? Jesus. The
Conspiracy Chicks at least come right out and say what they're
thinking--and they ARE cute. I wish they would come and pay me a visit
in their pajamas. Physicists on the other hand may act cute, but
usually when it comes right down to it, they really aren't anything of
the kind. Mostly pretty un-cute by and large.
--
JM http://groups.google.com/group/readers-round-table