From: Alfred Molon on
In article <m52ov5dqm1418cn77gt4mbqnr9ttm2n8m1(a)4ax.com>, nate bishop
says...
> Oh really. Then tell me, why are they listed in all camera reviews, in
> manuals, and even on the boxes they come in, with sensor sizes of 1/3.6,
> 1/3.2, 1/3, 1/2.7, 1/2.5, 1/2.3, 1/2, 1/1.8, 1/1.7, 2/3, 1/1, 4/3, 1.8,
> etc.

That Vidicon tube stuff is only in use with small compact camera
sensors, not for larger DSLR sensors. For these the size is always given
in length x width. Go educate yourself.
--

Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: John Navas on
On Tue, 25 May 2010 21:36:37 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com>
wrote in <4bfca557$0$1603$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>:

>And Micro 4/3 is essentially a P&S with interchangeable lenses. It
>retains most of the disadvantages of P&S cameras other than having a
>much larger sensor (but much smaller than mainstream D-SLRs).

Total nonsense.
--
Best regards,
John

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford
From: dj_nme on
Alfred Molon wrote:
> In article <m52ov5dqm1418cn77gt4mbqnr9ttm2n8m1(a)4ax.com>, nate bishop
> says...
>> Oh really. Then tell me, why are they listed in all camera reviews, in
>> manuals, and even on the boxes they come in, with sensor sizes of 1/3.6,
>> 1/3.2, 1/3, 1/2.7, 1/2.5, 1/2.3, 1/2, 1/1.8, 1/1.7, 2/3, 1/1, 4/3, 1.8,
>> etc.
>
> That Vidicon tube stuff is only in use with small compact camera
> sensors, not for larger DSLR sensors. For these the size is always given
> in length x width. Go educate yourself.

No entirely true, it depends on the camera maker.
For example: Nikon uses two-letter descriptors (FX for full-frame
[24x36mm] and DX for 1.5x crop [25.1�16.7mm]) for the different sensor
sizes on their DSLR cameras.
Others use terms such as "ASP-C", "APS-H" or "FourThirds" to describe
smaller than FX sized sensors.
Very few actually state the actual sensor size in millimetres (or inches).
From: Alfred Molon on
In article <4bfdb113$0$3165$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au>, dj_nme
says...

> No entirely true, it depends on the camera maker.
> For example: Nikon uses two-letter descriptors (FX for full-frame
> [24x36mm] and DX for 1.5x crop [25.1×16.7mm]) for the different sensor
> sizes on their DSLR cameras.
> Others use terms such as "ASP-C", "APS-H" or "FourThirds" to describe
> smaller than FX sized sensors.
> Very few actually state the actual sensor size in millimetres (or inches)..

The terms APS-C, DX and FX etc. are in use, but I've never seen an inch
size (") for a large sensor.
And APS-C is not an exact size - sensor sizes can vary slightly, around
22 - 24mm width.
Also crop factors are in use, but not Vidicon tube sizes.
--

Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: Bruce on
On Thu, 27 May 2010 07:58:26 +0200, Alfred Molon
<alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <4bfdb113$0$3165$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au>, dj_nme
>says...
>
>> No entirely true, it depends on the camera maker.
>> For example: Nikon uses two-letter descriptors (FX for full-frame
>> [24x36mm] and DX for 1.5x crop [25.1�16.7mm]) for the different sensor
>> sizes on their DSLR cameras.
>> Others use terms such as "ASP-C", "APS-H" or "FourThirds" to describe
>> smaller than FX sized sensors.
>> Very few actually state the actual sensor size in millimetres (or inches).
>
>The terms APS-C, DX and FX etc. are in use, but I've never seen an inch
>size (") for a large sensor.
>And APS-C is not an exact size - sensor sizes can vary slightly, around
>22 - 24mm width.
>Also crop factors are in use, but not Vidicon tube sizes.


So you are still in denial about four thirds of an inch ...