Leica; "4/3rds quality just not there."
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Leica; "4/3rds quality just not there."
Next: Film cam better than digital for harsh environments?
From: Alfred Molon on 29 May 2010 05:37 In article <hto0gn$h93$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, David J Taylor says... > I'd go further - for 99% of camera users a P&S or mobile-phone camera is > "adequate". Perhaps 99% is a little high. Show me a mobile phone with "adequate" image quality. Most mobile phones do not even have optical zooms. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: David J Taylor on 29 May 2010 10:27 "Alfred Molon" <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:MPG.266afede79df789b98c315(a)news.supernews.com... > In article <hto0gn$h93$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, David J Taylor > says... >> I'd go further - for 99% of camera users a P&S or mobile-phone camera >> is >> "adequate". Perhaps 99% is a little high. > > Show me a mobile phone with "adequate" image quality. Most mobile phones > do not even have optical zooms. Several offer 5MP, for example: http://www.mobilephonereviews.org/category/5mp-camera-phone/ or with 3x optical zoom: http://www.mobilephonereviews.org/samsung/samsung-g800-5mp-camera-mobile-phone/ I did suggest that either a mobile phone /or/ P&S might be required to satisfy "adequate", not either alone. Cheers, David
From: Alfred Molon on 29 May 2010 13:28
In article <htr8a6$2hm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, David J Taylor says... > Several offer 5MP, for example: > > http://www.mobilephonereviews.org/category/5mp-camera-phone/ .... and most likely poor image quality. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |