Let's Take A Vote...
in [Design]
|
From: dagmargoodboat on 3 Aug 2010 23:16 On Aug 1, 10:43 pm, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:35:35 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com > wrote: > > > > >On Aug 1, 1:02 pm, Nunya <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: > >> On Aug 1, 8:20 am, John Larkin > > >> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:10:49 -0700, > >> > What's interesting is how little attention the climate alarmists give > >> > to particulates. The reason is obvious: they want to use CO2 limits to > >> > strangle the world's capitalist economies, and just adding some > >> > filters can't accomplish that, so they don't care about particulates.. > > >> > John > > >> A diesel engine pollutes the air LESS than a gasoline engine does, > >> idiot. > > >> The particulates enitted are heavy, and they do NOT remain suspended > >> in our atmosphere, idiot! > > >> A diesel engine is the least pollutive combustion engine in current > >> mass use. > > >As long as it doesn't burn dung or wood. > > >Hey, the world's particulate "solution" might be to get more people > >burning fossil fuels. > > There are lots of people who would prefer natural gas to dung. Let them eat dung^H^H^H^H, errr, cake. -- Cheers, James Arthur
From: JosephKK on 4 Aug 2010 00:15 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 06:48:53 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:52:06 -0700, >"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:59:12 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:27:17 -0700 (PDT), Nunya <jack_shephard(a)cox.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Aug 1, 12:15�pm, Richard Henry <pomer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Aug 1, 10:02�am, Nunya <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > On Aug 1, 8:20�am, John Larkin >>>>> >>>>> > <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>> > > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:10:49 -0700, >>>>> > > What's interesting is how little attention the climate alarmists give >>>>> > > to particulates. The reason is obvious: they want to use CO2 limits to >>>>> > > strangle the world's capitalist economies, and just adding some >>>>> > > filters can't accomplish that, so they don't care about particulates. >>>>> >>>>> > > John >>>>> >>>>> > � A diesel engine pollutes the air LESS than a gasoline engine does, >>>>> > idiot. >>>>> >>>>> > � The particulates enitted are heavy, and they do NOT remain suspended >>>>> > in our atmosphere, idiot! >>>>> >>>>> > � A diesel engine is the least pollutive combustion engine in current >>>>> > mass use. >>>>> >>>>> I did not know that. �Do you have a source for that knowledge? >>>> >>>> Diesel VW Jetta: 42mpg, low rpm vehicle. >>> >>>Wussmobile. >>> >>>John >> >>Gosh John, that is a personal attack disguised as a proper response. > >You're reading a lot into one word. > >John Many single words like motherf***** have no other interpretation, wussmobile is one of them as well.
From: Jim Thompson on 4 Aug 2010 00:30 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:15:47 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 06:48:53 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:52:06 -0700, >>"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:59:12 -0700, John Larkin >>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:27:17 -0700 (PDT), Nunya <jack_shephard(a)cox.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Aug 1, 12:15�pm, Richard Henry <pomer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Aug 1, 10:02�am, Nunya <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > On Aug 1, 8:20�am, John Larkin >>>>>> >>>>>> > <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>>> > > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:10:49 -0700, >>>>>> > > What's interesting is how little attention the climate alarmists give >>>>>> > > to particulates. The reason is obvious: they want to use CO2 limits to >>>>>> > > strangle the world's capitalist economies, and just adding some >>>>>> > > filters can't accomplish that, so they don't care about particulates. >>>>>> >>>>>> > > John >>>>>> >>>>>> > � A diesel engine pollutes the air LESS than a gasoline engine does, >>>>>> > idiot. >>>>>> >>>>>> > � The particulates enitted are heavy, and they do NOT remain suspended >>>>>> > in our atmosphere, idiot! >>>>>> >>>>>> > � A diesel engine is the least pollutive combustion engine in current >>>>>> > mass use. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did not know that. �Do you have a source for that knowledge? >>>>> >>>>> Diesel VW Jetta: 42mpg, low rpm vehicle. >>>> >>>>Wussmobile. >>>> >>>>John >>> >>>Gosh John, that is a personal attack disguised as a proper response. >> >>You're reading a lot into one word. >> >>John > >Many single words like motherf***** have no other interpretation, >wussmobile is one of them as well. [snicker] [snicker] ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Phoenix, AZ, a city noted for many civic-oriented inventions such as automated garbage collection, has added a new tool to its Fire Department safety equipment... addressing problems with accidents involving so-called Smart Cars: A Hydraulically Assisted Spatula.
From: John Larkin on 4 Aug 2010 11:47 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:15:47 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 06:48:53 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:52:06 -0700, >>"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:59:12 -0700, John Larkin >>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:27:17 -0700 (PDT), Nunya <jack_shephard(a)cox.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Aug 1, 12:15�pm, Richard Henry <pomer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Aug 1, 10:02�am, Nunya <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > On Aug 1, 8:20�am, John Larkin >>>>>> >>>>>> > <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>>> > > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:10:49 -0700, >>>>>> > > What's interesting is how little attention the climate alarmists give >>>>>> > > to particulates. The reason is obvious: they want to use CO2 limits to >>>>>> > > strangle the world's capitalist economies, and just adding some >>>>>> > > filters can't accomplish that, so they don't care about particulates. >>>>>> >>>>>> > > John >>>>>> >>>>>> > � A diesel engine pollutes the air LESS than a gasoline engine does, >>>>>> > idiot. >>>>>> >>>>>> > � The particulates enitted are heavy, and they do NOT remain suspended >>>>>> > in our atmosphere, idiot! >>>>>> >>>>>> > � A diesel engine is the least pollutive combustion engine in current >>>>>> > mass use. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did not know that. �Do you have a source for that knowledge? >>>>> >>>>> Diesel VW Jetta: 42mpg, low rpm vehicle. >>>> >>>>Wussmobile. >>>> >>>>John >>> >>>Gosh John, that is a personal attack disguised as a proper response. >> >>You're reading a lot into one word. >> >>John > >Many single words like motherf***** have no other interpretation, >wussmobile is one of them as well. I wouldn't have it any other way. What do you drive? John
From: Nunya on 4 Aug 2010 12:53
On Aug 3, 1:39 pm, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Nunya <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> > wrote: > > > > >On Aug 3, 6:48 am, John Larkin > ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:52:06 -0700, > > >> "JosephKK"<quiettechb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:59:12 -0700, John Larkin > >> ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > > >> >>On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:27:17 -0700 (PDT), Nunya <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> > >> >>wrote: > > >> >>>On Aug 1, 12:15 pm, Richard Henry <pomer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> On Aug 1, 10:02 am, Nunya <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > >> >>>> > On Aug 1, 8:20 am, John Larkin > > >> >>>> > <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:10:49 -0700, > >> >>>> > > What's interesting is how little attention the climate alarmists give > >> >>>> > > to particulates. The reason is obvious: they want to use CO2 limits to > >> >>>> > > strangle the world's capitalist economies, and just adding some > >> >>>> > > filters can't accomplish that, so they don't care about particulates. > > >> >>>> > > John > > >> >>>> > A diesel engine pollutes the air LESS than a gasoline engine does, > >> >>>> > idiot. > > >> >>>> > The particulates enitted are heavy, and they do NOT remain suspended > >> >>>> > in our atmosphere, idiot! > > >> >>>> > A diesel engine is the least pollutive combustion engine in current > >> >>>> > mass use. > > >> >>>> I did not know that. Do you have a source for that knowledge? > > >> >>> Diesel VW Jetta: 42mpg, low rpm vehicle. > > >> >>Wussmobile. > > >> >>John > > >> >Gosh John, that is a personal attack disguised as a proper response. > > >> You're reading a lot into one word. > > >> John > > > You're a goddamned liar. You get worse once you are caught at it. > > Liar? A diesel Jetta *is* a Wussmobile. No, John. You are a Wuss of a man. That much is clearly aparent. > I have a friend who liked my A3 so much, she traded in her Camry > hybrid for one. John. the A3 is lame too. I think it hilarious that you tout it as something special. Par for the course though, since you tout yourself the same way, all the while calling others 'floor sweepers', etc. You are about the poorest excuse for a man I have seen in decades, and that includes bad cops, and I have seen more than a few of those. She got the 2L "clean" turbo diesel, which starts and > drives and sounds, to me, exactly like a gas car. Well, not like my > V6, but about like the 2L gas engine version. > > John |