From: Sam Wormley on
On 3/13/10 10:52 PM, The Great Attractor wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:02:50 -0600, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/10 7:52 PM, a7yvm109gf5d1(a)netzero.com wrote:
>>> Perpetual motion is built into the universe, it's a fundamental
>>> property of it.
>>> Of course, limited by its life span.
>>> See: Newton's first.
>>> "Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that
>>> state of motion unless an external force is applied to it. "
>>> Things move forever as long as they're not disturbed.
>>>
>>> I guess that means perpetual motion is quite boring.
>>
>> The term perpetual motion, taken literally, refers to movement that goes
>> on forever. However, the term more commonly refers to any device or
>> system that perpetually (indefinitely) produces more energy than it
>> consumes, resulting in a net output of energy for indefinite time.
>>
>> The total momentum-energy of the universe is fixed and constant.
>
>
> Yes... fixed at the value of ALL... and NOTHING.
>
> If our "Universe" is a mere "bubble" inside a larger Superverse, then
> your claim needs re-evaluation.

Maybe not.


From: Sue... on
On Mar 11, 5:09 pm, Bill Beaty <bi...(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
[...]
Hardly worth the design time. Simply sprinkle some saw dust
and syrup on a real machine 'till it stops working. Then
you will have a fake machine.

Sue...


From: The Great Attractor on
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:15:07 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 3/13/10 10:52 PM, The Great Attractor wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:02:50 -0600, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/11/10 7:52 PM, a7yvm109gf5d1(a)netzero.com wrote:
>>>> Perpetual motion is built into the universe, it's a fundamental
>>>> property of it.
>>>> Of course, limited by its life span.
>>>> See: Newton's first.
>>>> "Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that
>>>> state of motion unless an external force is applied to it. "
>>>> Things move forever as long as they're not disturbed.
>>>>
>>>> I guess that means perpetual motion is quite boring.
>>>
>>> The term perpetual motion, taken literally, refers to movement that goes
>>> on forever. However, the term more commonly refers to any device or
>>> system that perpetually (indefinitely) produces more energy than it
>>> consumes, resulting in a net output of energy for indefinite time.
>>>
>>> The total momentum-energy of the universe is fixed and constant.
>>
>>
>> Yes... fixed at the value of ALL... and NOTHING.
>>
>> If our "Universe" is a mere "bubble" inside a larger Superverse, then
>> your claim needs re-evaluation.
>
> Maybe not.
>


In the grand, quantum scheme of things, I guess perhaps not.
From: Bill Beaty on
On Mar 14, 11:36 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Hardly worth the design time.  

It's the Randi technique: a good fake can lead many onlookers to think
more critically, and might even cause some of the believers to think
twice.


> Simply sprinkle some saw dust
> and syrup on a real machine 'till it stops working.  Then
> you will have a fake machine.

So you didn't like the famous fake PM machines built by David Jones,
"Daedalus," columnist in Nature?

PM Machines as Art
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/art.htm

His were straightforward: battery banks, plus very well hidden
electrical connections. Much cooler would be to intercept ambient RF
from distant AM stations, 60Hz b-fields, or perhaps harness the
thermal IR of warm human passersby. Or build something which turns
for weeks, while slowly destroying a permanent magnet.


((((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( (o) ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty Research Engineer
beaty a chem washington edu UW Chem Dept, Bagley Hall RM74
billb a eskimo com Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700
ph206-762-3818 http://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/
From: bert on
On Mar 14, 12:02 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/11/10 7:52 PM, a7yvm109gf...(a)netzero.com wrote:
>
> > Perpetual motion is built into the universe, it's a fundamental
> > property of it.
> > Of course, limited by its life span.
> > See: Newton's first.
> > "Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that
> > state of motion unless an external force is applied to it. "
> > Things move forever as long as they're not disturbed.
>
> > I guess that means perpetual motion is quite boring.
>
> The term perpetual motion, taken literally, refers to movement that goes
> on forever. However, the term more commonly refers to any device or
> system that perpetually (indefinitely) produces more energy than it
> consumes, resulting in a net output of energy for indefinite time.
>
> The total momentum-energy of the universe is fixed and constant.

Sam My lastest idea is to marry a wind turbine to large flywheel. Its
machanical energy all the way down TreBert
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Quad LVDS to LVPECL?
Next: A strange PIC problem