From: MooseFET on
On Mar 15, 1:27 am, Bill Beaty <bi...(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 14, 11:36 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Hardly worth the design time.  
>
> It's the Randi technique: a good fake can lead many onlookers to think
> more critically, and might even cause some of the believers to think
> twice.
>
[...]

If you split a chunk of wood, you can glue it back together along the
split and the split can be near impossible to detect. The chunk of
wood can be hollowed out so that batteries, electronics and a a coil
can be hidden inside.

Tubing can works as the structure for holding stuff up and as a way
to hide the energy source. It can also work as a way to bring
compressed air to the machine through a hidden pipe.

A table can have a powerful electromagnet hidden under it. If most
of the machine is nonmagnetic the magnetic part that is attracted
by the magnet can be some distance above the table.

The entire room can be on a giant turntable. If all the light
sources and the camera etc are all in motion, a stationary weighted
wheel would appear to be rotating.

You can give an object with low friction a spin with your hand and it
will spin for a few minutes. Reverse the direction of the tape and
then dub in your voice and you have a device that speeds up over time.

If really low amounts of power are needed, the natural changes in air
temperature and pressure can be used as a power source.
From: Sam Wormley on
On 3/15/10 8:11 AM, bert wrote:
> On Mar 14, 12:02 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>>
>> The total momentum-energy of the universe is fixed and constant.
>
> Sam My lastest idea is to marry a wind turbine to large flywheel. Its
> machanical energy all the way down TreBert

Put one on your boat, Herb!
From: Bill Beaty on
On Mar 15, 7:09 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>    Put one on your boat, Herb!

Or on a railroad cart.

Hey, David Jones has a PM machine movie!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf7czii7dH0



((((((((((((((((((((((( ( ( (o) ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty Research Engineer
beaty a chem washington edu UW Chem Dept, Bagley Hall RM74
billb a eskimo com Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700
ph206-762-3818 http://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/
From: Greegor on
Is there any math on how fast ""permanent magnet""
generators (or DC motors used in that role)
wear down their magnets?

From: Tim Williams on
"Greegor" <greegor47(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0ef57af7-3070-48b1-a225-5e89d2917809(a)q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com...
> Is there any math on how fast ""permanent magnet""
> generators (or DC motors used in that role)
> wear down their magnets?

By "stressing" a permanent magnet (i.e., applying opposing magnetization),
you drive its B-H curve slightly backwards. If you push it past the
coercive force Hc, you'll demagnetize it. Fortunately, this takes an awful
lot of magnetization (ca. 1MA/m). For normal operating levels, you only
push the magnet a little way back along the B-H curve. Because it's quite
square, the drop in remanence (field strength) is small, and after an
initial burn-in at full load, it will remain quite the same for the rest of
its operating life.

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Quad LVDS to LVPECL?
Next: A strange PIC problem