Lightning extension for TBird 3.1 at RC
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: [UPD] TBird 3.1 available
Next: TBird 3.1 available
From: Dustin Cook on 29 Jun 2010 20:57 Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote in news:Xns9DA6C64BAA4C8bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net: > Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in > news:Xns9DA6CC135B9F3HHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.247: > >> Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote in >> news:Xns9DA6BD5852880bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net: >> >>> Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in >>> news:Xns9DA6BE2397E6AHHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.250: >>> >>>> I don't require internet access. the email server is on the same >>>> LAN. I can connect via an internal IP, never talking on the >>>> internet, or just copy the mail files (it stores emails seperate as >>>> text files) to another machine for reading with notepad. *g*. >>> >>> How would email I send to you get to your server? >> >> It wouldn't. It's a closed server. IE: The firewall has no mappings >> for it to talk outside of the LAN. It's configured to only acknowledge >> connections coming from the LAN as well. >> > Swell, everyone needs that. LOL, probably not, no. It serves a specific purpose. -- I'm just an ordinary average guy. My friends are all boring, and so am I. We're just ordinary average guys. We all lead ordinary lives, with average kids and average wifes. We all go bowling at the bowling lanes; drink a few beers bowl a few frames. We're just ordinary average guys.
From: H-Man on 30 Jun 2010 10:38 On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:39:48 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: > This Communist liberal idea that the best can't be deterined is bollocks. > What you relate to is "it is good enough for them." Politics were not ever discussed to this point. I am neither a communist nor a liberal from a political standpoint, but that would be none of your business. I should have been clearer because you seem to have misunderstood. TBird is the best for me. It is not, "good enough", it is better for me than Gmail, and anything else I've tried. It is the best for me. If it is not the best for you, then I am glad you found a better option, please do not impose your opinion on me. -- HK
From: H-Man on 30 Jun 2010 11:06 On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:39:48 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: > This Communist liberal idea that the best can't be deterined is bollocks. > What you relate to is "it is good enough for them." Okay, first you make an insane statement like Gmail is the best. Not in your opinion, but just a flat statement. If you would know what is best for everyone else, then that my communist Bottoms is communism. "Just don't think, I know what's best for everyone". Not your words, but most certainly your message here. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Then you make a completely false statement like "As you know, mail servers host the mail - all are webmail". And when called on it, you deflect your inaccurate statement with, 'never mind what I said, my point is still valid'. Again, not your words, but your message is clear. Look, I get that people make inaccurate statements sometimes. We get involved in these discussions and get derailed because of details that have no bearing on the discussion at hand, Kinda like where this discussion has gone. You are absolutely correct in your assertion that Gmail is best for you. It is not the best email client for me. At least not at this point. So please do not cast your assertions on me, you have no right! -- HK
From: H-Man on 5 Jul 2010 09:51 On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:08:22 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: > H-Man <Spam(a)bites.fs> wrote in > news:4c2b56f7$0$65829$892e0abb(a)auth.newsreader.octanews.com: > >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:39:48 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: >> >>> This Communist liberal idea that the best can't be deterined is >>> bollocks. What you relate to is "it is good enough for them." >> >> Politics were not ever discussed to this point. I am neither a >> communist nor a liberal from a political standpoint, but that would be >> none of your business. >> >> I should have been clearer because you seem to have misunderstood. >> TBird is the best for me. It is not, "good enough", it is better for >> me than Gmail, and anything else I've tried. It is the best for me. If >> it is not the best for you, then I am glad you found a better option, >> please do not impose your opinion on me. >> > > There is no fine line between better. There is a line. That line can be > discerned objectively. Some things are better than other things. It can > be measured or laid out. I do not subscribe to the idea that everyone > gets a trophy...win lose or draw. Niether do I. I also do not believe in one size fits all, or universal fit. Better for an individual moves the 'line' one way or the other. The 'line' is defined by the requirements of the user, not by the requirements you choose to evaluate by. -- HK
From: H-Man on 5 Jul 2010 11:56
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:24:58 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: > H-Man <Spam(a)bites.fs> wrote in > news:4c31e361$0$65838$892e0abb(a)auth.newsreader.octanews.com: > >>> There is no fine line between better. There is a line. That line can >>> be discerned objectively. Some things are better than other things. >>> It can be measured or laid out. I do not subscribe to the idea that >>> everyone gets a trophy...win lose or draw. >> >> Niether do I. I also do not believe in one size fits all, or universal >> fit. >> >> Better for an individual moves the 'line' one way or the other. The >> 'line' is defined by the requirements of the user, not by the >> requirements you choose to evaluate by. >> > > This is a place for opinions...I gave mine. Okay, so then it's your opinion that Gmail is the best? > These opinions help enrich the field of choice...why do you offer yours? Same reason. I would respectfully ask that if you are offering opinion, please state it as such. Otherwise you are attempting to impose what can only be opinion on others, and in my opinion that is just bad form. Either way, do as you choose, I won't waste more any time on this. -- HK |